India Uncut
This blog has moved to its own domain. Please visit IndiaUncut.com for the all-new India
Uncut and bookmark it. The new site has much more content and some new sections, and you can read about them here and here. You can subscribe to full RSS feeds of all the sections from here.
This blogspot site will no longer be updated, except in case of emergencies, if the main site suffers a prolonged outage. Thanks - Amit.
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
Lions and elephants roaming Golden Gate Park
James D Miller wants to give San Francisco what it wants. Heh.
Look ma, no gears
Ratan Tata reveals some of the specs of his Rs 100,000 (apprx. US$2270) car.
A glitch in the matrix
Residents of Mumbai will sense the familiar in this carnage. The New York Times reports about New Orleans:
With bridges washed out, highways converted into canals, and power and communications lines inoperable, government officials ordered everyone still remaining out of the city. Officials began planning for the evacuation of the Superdome, where about 10,000 refugees huddled in increasingly grim conditions as water and food were running out and rising water threatened the generators.
[...]
Across the region, rescue workers were not even trying to gather up and count the dead, officials said, but pushed them aside for the time being as they tried to find the living.
There's some good coverage on Hurricane Katrina on Instapundit -- particularly this post. CNN has been doing a great job as well, and there are some affecting video clips on their site. And here are reports from the BBC, the Washington Post and Reuters.
Labour problems force plane to land
Thankfully, there's a mother involved, not a union.
Pigs and the family
The Reddy family is fighting about pigs. Sushama Reddy says:
Pigs are the most misunderstood animals. It’s (sic) not as detached as a cat, but neither will it slobber all over you like a dog, but the fact is that a pig is extremely loyal. I think they are ideal pets and look so very adorable. I don’t mind rolling in the muck like a pig.
Well, we wouldn't mind it either, as long as she posted the pics. Meanwhile, her dad, CP Reddy, says:
Pigs symbolise pain and misery. They are dirty and it’s unpleasant to even have its picture at home. I don’t like the idea of Sushama collecting these things.
Interestingly, it seems from the article these quotes are from that Sushama doesn't even collect real pigs, but "pig soft toys, wall hangings, soaps, key chains, ceramic and clay pigs in different sizes." Dudette, get a real hog into your life, that's where the action is. Or a real cow.
(Link via the rockacious, bloggacious best-blogger-on-the-planetacious Sonia.)
God's advocates
Heh. Check out this page: "Over Three Hundred Proofs of God’s Existence". I'm scrolling down and picking three random ones from that page:
263 ARGUMENT FROM YOUTH GROUP MINISTER
(1) God is awesome!
(2) Like, totally, dude!
(3) Therefore, God, like, exists and stuff.
264 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INABILITY
(1) The Bible says Jesus turned water into wine.
(2) Can you turn water into wine?
(3) No? Well there ya go.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
265 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL ABILITY
(1) I prayed to God, and then lifted a car off my trapped puppy.
(2) I couldn't have done that without God.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
Nice. Read them all.
(Link via Zoo Station.)
Blog Day 2005
It turns out that today is Blog Day 2005 (Peter has the details here). So, um, Happy Blog Day. On this day, we're supposed to introduce our readers to five new blogs but, um, I haven't come across any new blogs lately, so I'll cheat and tell you about five blogs that aren't exactly new, but that I enjoy, and deserve to be read by many, many more people.
1] Zoo Station, run by Reuben Abraham and others. Outstanding.
2] Clipboard Conversations and Other (A)Musings, run by J Ramanand. (Trivia: the first blog to blogroll India Uncut.)
3] Filthy, funny, flawed, gorgeous, by my old pal from my MTV days, Ammani.
4] A walk in the clouds, by Megha Murthy. I like the tone of her writing. She's a sit-down-on-sofa-relax-and-read kind of blogger.
5] The Corridor of Uncertainty, by Will Luke. An excellent cricket blog. Its author is now my colleague at Cricinfo, which I've rejoined. (I'd left for a couple of months.)
I've deliberately left out the libertarian cartel, as well as the blogger buddies I hang out with most these days (1, 2 and 3), and I pray they won't take offence. And for more fantastic blogs, do explore my blogroll on the left panel: much value in there. (And yes, I'm expanding it soon.)
Liberal and conservative dreams
Kelly Bulkeley, who most recently wrote a book called "Dreaming Beyond Death: A Guide to Pre-Death Dreams and Visions", reveals in an interview what liberals and conservatives dream about. He says:
[W]hat I've found as a general trend is that the dreams of political liberals tend to have more bizarre, fantastical kinds of elements: more flying, more dead people coming back to life, more weird sexual dreams.
Conservatives, by contrast, tend to have more dreams of everyday events, every day settings and interaction.
Er, but what if "weird sexual" things are "everyday events" for you? You're probably a libertarian then! Libertarians mostly find themselves unable to support either conservatives or liberals (in the American sense; many libertarians would call themselves classical liberals). As I'd stated here, libertarians believe in individual freedom, and end up opposing the left because they are against economic freedom, and the right because they are often against social freedom. So we end up supporting free markets, and the leftists call us right-wingers and "free-market fundamentalists", and we end up supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, while opposing censorship, and the right calls us "woolyheaded liberals" for that. Everybody hates us, and all for sticking to that simple principle of freedom.
And no, I am not going going to tell you what I dream about.
(Interview link via email from reader Shravan Enaganti.)
When the earth shook ... slightly
It turns out that there were low-intensity tremors in parts of Maharastra, including Mumbai, yesterday. Mumbai happens to lie on a faultline, and it is not inconceivable that it will be struck by an earthquake someday. I happen to live in an oldish building, though not as dilapidated as this one, and that worries me a bit. As also the fact that on the evidence of the aftermath of the recent floods, Mumbai will not be able to cope with a really big disaster.
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A shooter, not an assassin
Ahmed Al Maktoum, the shooter from Dubai, is upset that an assassin from Dubai in the film Sarkar is referred to as an Olympic gold medalist in shooting. Al Maktoum won an Olympic gold in the double trap last year, beating India's Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, and feels it's a derogatory reference to him.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Start with toilets
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Residents of Mumbai will sense the familiar in this carnage. The New York Times reports about New Orleans:
With bridges washed out, highways converted into canals, and power and communications lines inoperable, government officials ordered everyone still remaining out of the city. Officials began planning for the evacuation of the Superdome, where about 10,000 refugees huddled in increasingly grim conditions as water and food were running out and rising water threatened the generators.There's some good coverage on Hurricane Katrina on Instapundit -- particularly this post. CNN has been doing a great job as well, and there are some affecting video clips on their site. And here are reports from the BBC, the Washington Post and Reuters.
[...]
Across the region, rescue workers were not even trying to gather up and count the dead, officials said, but pushed them aside for the time being as they tried to find the living.
Labour problems force plane to land
Thankfully, there's a mother involved, not a union.
Pigs and the family
The Reddy family is fighting about pigs. Sushama Reddy says:
Pigs are the most misunderstood animals. It’s (sic) not as detached as a cat, but neither will it slobber all over you like a dog, but the fact is that a pig is extremely loyal. I think they are ideal pets and look so very adorable. I don’t mind rolling in the muck like a pig.
Well, we wouldn't mind it either, as long as she posted the pics. Meanwhile, her dad, CP Reddy, says:
Pigs symbolise pain and misery. They are dirty and it’s unpleasant to even have its picture at home. I don’t like the idea of Sushama collecting these things.
Interestingly, it seems from the article these quotes are from that Sushama doesn't even collect real pigs, but "pig soft toys, wall hangings, soaps, key chains, ceramic and clay pigs in different sizes." Dudette, get a real hog into your life, that's where the action is. Or a real cow.
(Link via the rockacious, bloggacious best-blogger-on-the-planetacious Sonia.)
God's advocates
Heh. Check out this page: "Over Three Hundred Proofs of God’s Existence". I'm scrolling down and picking three random ones from that page:
263 ARGUMENT FROM YOUTH GROUP MINISTER
(1) God is awesome!
(2) Like, totally, dude!
(3) Therefore, God, like, exists and stuff.
264 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INABILITY
(1) The Bible says Jesus turned water into wine.
(2) Can you turn water into wine?
(3) No? Well there ya go.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
265 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL ABILITY
(1) I prayed to God, and then lifted a car off my trapped puppy.
(2) I couldn't have done that without God.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
Nice. Read them all.
(Link via Zoo Station.)
Blog Day 2005
It turns out that today is Blog Day 2005 (Peter has the details here). So, um, Happy Blog Day. On this day, we're supposed to introduce our readers to five new blogs but, um, I haven't come across any new blogs lately, so I'll cheat and tell you about five blogs that aren't exactly new, but that I enjoy, and deserve to be read by many, many more people.
1] Zoo Station, run by Reuben Abraham and others. Outstanding.
2] Clipboard Conversations and Other (A)Musings, run by J Ramanand. (Trivia: the first blog to blogroll India Uncut.)
3] Filthy, funny, flawed, gorgeous, by my old pal from my MTV days, Ammani.
4] A walk in the clouds, by Megha Murthy. I like the tone of her writing. She's a sit-down-on-sofa-relax-and-read kind of blogger.
5] The Corridor of Uncertainty, by Will Luke. An excellent cricket blog. Its author is now my colleague at Cricinfo, which I've rejoined. (I'd left for a couple of months.)
I've deliberately left out the libertarian cartel, as well as the blogger buddies I hang out with most these days (1, 2 and 3), and I pray they won't take offence. And for more fantastic blogs, do explore my blogroll on the left panel: much value in there. (And yes, I'm expanding it soon.)
Liberal and conservative dreams
Kelly Bulkeley, who most recently wrote a book called "Dreaming Beyond Death: A Guide to Pre-Death Dreams and Visions", reveals in an interview what liberals and conservatives dream about. He says:
[W]hat I've found as a general trend is that the dreams of political liberals tend to have more bizarre, fantastical kinds of elements: more flying, more dead people coming back to life, more weird sexual dreams.
Conservatives, by contrast, tend to have more dreams of everyday events, every day settings and interaction.
Er, but what if "weird sexual" things are "everyday events" for you? You're probably a libertarian then! Libertarians mostly find themselves unable to support either conservatives or liberals (in the American sense; many libertarians would call themselves classical liberals). As I'd stated here, libertarians believe in individual freedom, and end up opposing the left because they are against economic freedom, and the right because they are often against social freedom. So we end up supporting free markets, and the leftists call us right-wingers and "free-market fundamentalists", and we end up supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, while opposing censorship, and the right calls us "woolyheaded liberals" for that. Everybody hates us, and all for sticking to that simple principle of freedom.
And no, I am not going going to tell you what I dream about.
(Interview link via email from reader Shravan Enaganti.)
When the earth shook ... slightly
It turns out that there were low-intensity tremors in parts of Maharastra, including Mumbai, yesterday. Mumbai happens to lie on a faultline, and it is not inconceivable that it will be struck by an earthquake someday. I happen to live in an oldish building, though not as dilapidated as this one, and that worries me a bit. As also the fact that on the evidence of the aftermath of the recent floods, Mumbai will not be able to cope with a really big disaster.
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A shooter, not an assassin
Ahmed Al Maktoum, the shooter from Dubai, is upset that an assassin from Dubai in the film Sarkar is referred to as an Olympic gold medalist in shooting. Al Maktoum won an Olympic gold in the double trap last year, beating India's Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, and feels it's a derogatory reference to him.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Start with toilets
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Reddy family is fighting about pigs. Sushama Reddy says:
(Link via the rockacious, bloggacious best-blogger-on-the-planetacious Sonia.)
Pigs are the most misunderstood animals. It’s (sic) not as detached as a cat, but neither will it slobber all over you like a dog, but the fact is that a pig is extremely loyal. I think they are ideal pets and look so very adorable. I don’t mind rolling in the muck like a pig.Well, we wouldn't mind it either, as long as she posted the pics. Meanwhile, her dad, CP Reddy, says:
Pigs symbolise pain and misery. They are dirty and it’s unpleasant to even have its picture at home. I don’t like the idea of Sushama collecting these things.Interestingly, it seems from the article these quotes are from that Sushama doesn't even collect real pigs, but "pig soft toys, wall hangings, soaps, key chains, ceramic and clay pigs in different sizes." Dudette, get a real hog into your life, that's where the action is. Or a real cow.
(Link via the rockacious, bloggacious best-blogger-on-the-planetacious Sonia.)
God's advocates
Heh. Check out this page: "Over Three Hundred Proofs of God’s Existence". I'm scrolling down and picking three random ones from that page:
263 ARGUMENT FROM YOUTH GROUP MINISTER
(1) God is awesome!
(2) Like, totally, dude!
(3) Therefore, God, like, exists and stuff.
264 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INABILITY
(1) The Bible says Jesus turned water into wine.
(2) Can you turn water into wine?
(3) No? Well there ya go.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
265 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL ABILITY
(1) I prayed to God, and then lifted a car off my trapped puppy.
(2) I couldn't have done that without God.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
Nice. Read them all.
(Link via Zoo Station.)
Blog Day 2005
It turns out that today is Blog Day 2005 (Peter has the details here). So, um, Happy Blog Day. On this day, we're supposed to introduce our readers to five new blogs but, um, I haven't come across any new blogs lately, so I'll cheat and tell you about five blogs that aren't exactly new, but that I enjoy, and deserve to be read by many, many more people.
1] Zoo Station, run by Reuben Abraham and others. Outstanding.
2] Clipboard Conversations and Other (A)Musings, run by J Ramanand. (Trivia: the first blog to blogroll India Uncut.)
3] Filthy, funny, flawed, gorgeous, by my old pal from my MTV days, Ammani.
4] A walk in the clouds, by Megha Murthy. I like the tone of her writing. She's a sit-down-on-sofa-relax-and-read kind of blogger.
5] The Corridor of Uncertainty, by Will Luke. An excellent cricket blog. Its author is now my colleague at Cricinfo, which I've rejoined. (I'd left for a couple of months.)
I've deliberately left out the libertarian cartel, as well as the blogger buddies I hang out with most these days (1, 2 and 3), and I pray they won't take offence. And for more fantastic blogs, do explore my blogroll on the left panel: much value in there. (And yes, I'm expanding it soon.)
Liberal and conservative dreams
Kelly Bulkeley, who most recently wrote a book called "Dreaming Beyond Death: A Guide to Pre-Death Dreams and Visions", reveals in an interview what liberals and conservatives dream about. He says:
[W]hat I've found as a general trend is that the dreams of political liberals tend to have more bizarre, fantastical kinds of elements: more flying, more dead people coming back to life, more weird sexual dreams.
Conservatives, by contrast, tend to have more dreams of everyday events, every day settings and interaction.
Er, but what if "weird sexual" things are "everyday events" for you? You're probably a libertarian then! Libertarians mostly find themselves unable to support either conservatives or liberals (in the American sense; many libertarians would call themselves classical liberals). As I'd stated here, libertarians believe in individual freedom, and end up opposing the left because they are against economic freedom, and the right because they are often against social freedom. So we end up supporting free markets, and the leftists call us right-wingers and "free-market fundamentalists", and we end up supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, while opposing censorship, and the right calls us "woolyheaded liberals" for that. Everybody hates us, and all for sticking to that simple principle of freedom.
And no, I am not going going to tell you what I dream about.
(Interview link via email from reader Shravan Enaganti.)
When the earth shook ... slightly
It turns out that there were low-intensity tremors in parts of Maharastra, including Mumbai, yesterday. Mumbai happens to lie on a faultline, and it is not inconceivable that it will be struck by an earthquake someday. I happen to live in an oldish building, though not as dilapidated as this one, and that worries me a bit. As also the fact that on the evidence of the aftermath of the recent floods, Mumbai will not be able to cope with a really big disaster.
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A shooter, not an assassin
Ahmed Al Maktoum, the shooter from Dubai, is upset that an assassin from Dubai in the film Sarkar is referred to as an Olympic gold medalist in shooting. Al Maktoum won an Olympic gold in the double trap last year, beating India's Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, and feels it's a derogatory reference to him.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Start with toilets
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
263 ARGUMENT FROM YOUTH GROUP MINISTERNice. Read them all.
(1) God is awesome!
(2) Like, totally, dude!
(3) Therefore, God, like, exists and stuff.
264 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL INABILITY
(1) The Bible says Jesus turned water into wine.
(2) Can you turn water into wine?
(3) No? Well there ya go.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
265 ARGUMENT FROM PERSONAL ABILITY
(1) I prayed to God, and then lifted a car off my trapped puppy.
(2) I couldn't have done that without God.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
(Link via Zoo Station.)
It turns out that today is Blog Day 2005 (Peter has the details here). So, um, Happy Blog Day. On this day, we're supposed to introduce our readers to five new blogs but, um, I haven't come across any new blogs lately, so I'll cheat and tell you about five blogs that aren't exactly new, but that I enjoy, and deserve to be read by many, many more people.
1] Zoo Station, run by Reuben Abraham and others. Outstanding.
2] Clipboard Conversations and Other (A)Musings, run by J Ramanand. (Trivia: the first blog to blogroll India Uncut.)
3] Filthy, funny, flawed, gorgeous, by my old pal from my MTV days, Ammani.
4] A walk in the clouds, by Megha Murthy. I like the tone of her writing. She's a sit-down-on-sofa-relax-and-read kind of blogger.
5] The Corridor of Uncertainty, by Will Luke. An excellent cricket blog. Its author is now my colleague at Cricinfo, which I've rejoined. (I'd left for a couple of months.)
I've deliberately left out the libertarian cartel, as well as the blogger buddies I hang out with most these days (1, 2 and 3), and I pray they won't take offence. And for more fantastic blogs, do explore my blogroll on the left panel: much value in there. (And yes, I'm expanding it soon.)
1] Zoo Station, run by Reuben Abraham and others. Outstanding.
2] Clipboard Conversations and Other (A)Musings, run by J Ramanand. (Trivia: the first blog to blogroll India Uncut.)
3] Filthy, funny, flawed, gorgeous, by my old pal from my MTV days, Ammani.
4] A walk in the clouds, by Megha Murthy. I like the tone of her writing. She's a sit-down-on-sofa-relax-and-read kind of blogger.
5] The Corridor of Uncertainty, by Will Luke. An excellent cricket blog. Its author is now my colleague at Cricinfo, which I've rejoined. (I'd left for a couple of months.)
I've deliberately left out the libertarian cartel, as well as the blogger buddies I hang out with most these days (1, 2 and 3), and I pray they won't take offence. And for more fantastic blogs, do explore my blogroll on the left panel: much value in there. (And yes, I'm expanding it soon.)
Liberal and conservative dreams
Kelly Bulkeley, who most recently wrote a book called "Dreaming Beyond Death: A Guide to Pre-Death Dreams and Visions", reveals in an interview what liberals and conservatives dream about. He says:
[W]hat I've found as a general trend is that the dreams of political liberals tend to have more bizarre, fantastical kinds of elements: more flying, more dead people coming back to life, more weird sexual dreams.
Conservatives, by contrast, tend to have more dreams of everyday events, every day settings and interaction.
Er, but what if "weird sexual" things are "everyday events" for you? You're probably a libertarian then! Libertarians mostly find themselves unable to support either conservatives or liberals (in the American sense; many libertarians would call themselves classical liberals). As I'd stated here, libertarians believe in individual freedom, and end up opposing the left because they are against economic freedom, and the right because they are often against social freedom. So we end up supporting free markets, and the leftists call us right-wingers and "free-market fundamentalists", and we end up supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, while opposing censorship, and the right calls us "woolyheaded liberals" for that. Everybody hates us, and all for sticking to that simple principle of freedom.
And no, I am not going going to tell you what I dream about.
(Interview link via email from reader Shravan Enaganti.)
When the earth shook ... slightly
It turns out that there were low-intensity tremors in parts of Maharastra, including Mumbai, yesterday. Mumbai happens to lie on a faultline, and it is not inconceivable that it will be struck by an earthquake someday. I happen to live in an oldish building, though not as dilapidated as this one, and that worries me a bit. As also the fact that on the evidence of the aftermath of the recent floods, Mumbai will not be able to cope with a really big disaster.
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A shooter, not an assassin
Ahmed Al Maktoum, the shooter from Dubai, is upset that an assassin from Dubai in the film Sarkar is referred to as an Olympic gold medalist in shooting. Al Maktoum won an Olympic gold in the double trap last year, beating India's Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, and feels it's a derogatory reference to him.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Start with toilets
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
[W]hat I've found as a general trend is that the dreams of political liberals tend to have more bizarre, fantastical kinds of elements: more flying, more dead people coming back to life, more weird sexual dreams.Er, but what if "weird sexual" things are "everyday events" for you? You're probably a libertarian then! Libertarians mostly find themselves unable to support either conservatives or liberals (in the American sense; many libertarians would call themselves classical liberals). As I'd stated here, libertarians believe in individual freedom, and end up opposing the left because they are against economic freedom, and the right because they are often against social freedom. So we end up supporting free markets, and the leftists call us right-wingers and "free-market fundamentalists", and we end up supporting abortion rights and gay marriage, while opposing censorship, and the right calls us "woolyheaded liberals" for that. Everybody hates us, and all for sticking to that simple principle of freedom.
Conservatives, by contrast, tend to have more dreams of everyday events, every day settings and interaction.
And no, I am not going going to tell you what I dream about.
(Interview link via email from reader Shravan Enaganti.)
It turns out that there were low-intensity tremors in parts of Maharastra, including Mumbai, yesterday. Mumbai happens to lie on a faultline, and it is not inconceivable that it will be struck by an earthquake someday. I happen to live in an oldish building, though not as dilapidated as this one, and that worries me a bit. As also the fact that on the evidence of the aftermath of the recent floods, Mumbai will not be able to cope with a really big disaster.
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A slightly smaller worry (and one I'd stated earlier): As in the story I just linked to, Mid Day keeps abbreviating "buildings" to "bldgs", and I keep misreading it as "blogs". And so my head is full of "weak blogs", "collapsing blogs", "dilapidated blogs" and "blogs that the BMC does not maintain". I worry that people will meet me on the road, stop me and ask, "How's the water supply in your blog?" Sigh. What can I do but building about it?
A shooter, not an assassin
Ahmed Al Maktoum, the shooter from Dubai, is upset that an assassin from Dubai in the film Sarkar is referred to as an Olympic gold medalist in shooting. Al Maktoum won an Olympic gold in the double trap last year, beating India's Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, and feels it's a derogatory reference to him.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Start with toilets
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Dude, next time let our guy win. Ok?
Sudheendra Kulkarni writes in the Indian Express that India's drive towards becoming a developed nation must begin with providing toilets for its citizens. And how do things stand now? He tells us:
Consider the statistics about the Total Sanitation Campaign, the centrally sponsored scheme of the ministry of rural development. Of the 138 million rural households, only 23.7 per cent have own toilets. The coverage in a state like Bihar is as low as 6.5 per cent, with BPL (below poverty line) households accounting for a paltry 0.7 per cent! Even in a rich state like Maharashtra, the coverage is only 19 per cent. The percentage of schools having toilets is 43 per cent and many of them are of very poor standards.The solution for problems such as this, in my view, is more likely to come from within communities, and via private enterprise and money (by which I means NGOs more than Nike), than from the government. Read Kulkarni's full piece, it's a valuable update on what is happening in this context, and on what remains to be done.
Is there is a solution? Yes. It has three components: massive public and private investment in sanitation; major efficiency enhancement in the functioning of panchayats, municipal bodies, and government departments; and, above all, large-scale people’s participation through organised voluntary action and penalty for offenders.
Speaking of destiny
Reacting to this story (that I linked to here), reader G Evans writes in:
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?
Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
If the children were "destined to be killed by their own mother," how is it not possible that the mother was destined to be prosecuted for murder?Nice. Couldn't have put it better myself.
It's all gone wrong in Iraq
But it's not too late. The Iraqi constitution is rather messed up, but if they read Kingsley Jegan's advice in time, they could still turn it around.
Scarecrows for terrorists
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Could India tackle agro-terrorism?
"Certain officers run amok"
That's the response of Amarinder Singh, the chief minister of Punjab, to the blatant misuse of power displayed by the Punjab Police, who arrested Gautam Dheer, an Indian Express reporter, because they were displeased with a story Dheer had written. I'd blogged on it here, and the Indian Express has an apt editorial up here.
The beautiful girls of Russia
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.
Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Edvard Radzinsky writes in the Wall Street Journal:
on Russian history, traces the position of women in Russia from the 18th century, when a popular saying went "A chicken's hardly a bird, a woman's hardly a person", to today's post-Soviet Russia, when Russian women "don't want to change the world. They want to conquer it."
For the greater part of the 20th century, Russia's population suffered from the nightmare of wars, repression and perpetual hunger. There was the famine of the Civil War, the famine of the years of collectivization, and the famine of the Second World War. It almost seems as if the relative prosperity of recent years has engendered a peculiar reaction of the flesh, something almost akin to gratitude. All across the country, a plethora of beautiful girls has sprung up.Read the full thing. Radzinsky, who has written some fascinating books
What was that again?
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.
That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
The kids of today
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
Read the full post here. Good stuff.
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Rahul in Kabul is like a bulbul: It flies away just when you think you’ve caught it.That's what "a bandhgala diplomat" remarked about Rahul Gandhi's trip to Afghanistan as part of the prime minister's entourage recently, according to this Telegraph story. Well, whatever.
Arun Simha points me to a fine blog called "The Religious Policeman", self-described as "The diary of a Saudi man, currently living in the United Kingdom, where the Religious Police no longer trouble him for the moment." It's fascinating stuff, laced with wit, and I especially laughed aloud at the following excerpt:
Conversation between two mothers in a Saudi supermarket:Read the full post here. Good stuff.
Mother 1: Oh hello, haven't seen you for ages*, how's little Abdullah?
Mother 2: Little Abdullah? He's really big now. He went off to Iraq to be a suicide bomber. And little Mohammad?
Mother 1: Same thing. No longer little either. He also went off to be a suicide bomber in Iraq
Mother 2: There you go. Don't children blow up quickly these days?
* (Ironic greeting exchanged between veiled ladies.)
A bribe to hold your baby
The New York Times reports from Bangalore:
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
Bloggers meet in Delhi
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
Let him go
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Just as the painful ordeal of childbirth finally ended and Nesam Velankanni waited for a nurse to lay her squalling newborn on her chest, the maternity hospital's ritual of extortion began.Most of us reading this are used to the endemic corruption in India, but I can't help feeling utterly shocked at this story. I can't imagine what goes through the minds of the nurses and attendants who ask a mother for money to allow her to hold her new-born kid. How stone-cold can you be?
Before she even glimpsed her baby, she said, a nurse whisked the infant away and an attendant demanded a bribe. If you want to see your child, families are told, the price is $12 for a boy and $7 for a girl, a lot of money for slum dwellers scraping by on a dollar a day. The practice is common here in the city, surveys confirm.
Mrs. Velankanni was penniless, and her mother-in-law had to pawn gold earrings that had been a precious marriage gift so she could give the money to the attendant, or ayah. Mrs. Velankanni, a migrant to Bangalore who had been unprepared for the demand, wept in frustration.
(Link via emails, separately, from Abhay Jajoo and Vimalanand Prabhu.)
What does a Mumbai blogger do when he shifts to Delhi? Why, he organises a bloggers' meet, of course. Saket Vaidya might have ditched his Mumbai pals, but Delhi bloggers are rejoicing. If you blog and are in Delhi on September 4, roll on over and meet some fellow bloggers. Saket has the details here.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
PS: If you do hop over and meet Saket, you might notice that one of his legs is rather longer than the other one. That's the one we've been pulling. You tug on the other one, and let's see if we can get them the same length.
Monday, August 29, 2005
The Mumbai police has stopped Salman Khan from leaving the country.
What have we done to deserve this?
What have we done to deserve this?
Contradictions and lies
Smriti Irani lays out the BJP's stand on reservations:
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.
I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Smile
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
BJP totally stands by reservations for women in parliament. The only thing it objects to is reservations on the basis of religion. In our country, everyone should be equal under the law. One should not encourage division on the basis of religion, region, caste or creed.I shall offer no comment on that.
In other news, the Supreme Court calls Zaheera Shaikh a liar. Well, she kept contradicting herself, so she was clearly lying at least part of the time. Now they'll fight over which parts of her testimonies were truthful. What a mess.
Yesterday I watched yet another amazing Test between England and Australia. Today, a lacklustre performance from India. And the difference is clear to me: enjoyment. The iconic figure of the English side is Andrew Flintoff, who is quick to smile on the field, and clearly enjoys every moment he spends on the field, relishing the game he loves. His attitude has rubbed off onto his team-mates, and it helps, I suppose, that England's captain is one of the more relaxed guys around.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
Contrast them with the Indians, who look under pressure even when there is no reason for it. They seem burdened, and only those who know them well can really shed light on what it is that holds them back. Trapped in a cycle of diffidence, they're just getting worse and worse.
Perhaps they simply need to smile more. As I'd once written here, that alone can be the start of a turnaround.
The tactical failure of LK Advani
LK Advani has blundered away his position in Indian politics. The darling of the far right, he thought he'd win himself the support of moderate (and secular) Indians with his comments about Muhammad Ali Jinnah in Pakistan, but he only succeeded in angering his core constituency on the right. And now, he's trying to woo them back with his support of Narendra Modi, which is ensuring that those moderates who were impressed by his statements on Jinnah have gone back to disregarding him. He has become na ghar ka na ghat ka, while earlier he could at least call one of them his home. What he must have thought of as a significant tactical shift has backfired completely.
MSB
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
We all know what MSM stands for. Well, now Arun Simha tells us all about how MSB (Mainstream Blogs) can be even more partisan.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
I must point out that I strongly disagree with what Arun says about Instapundit, though. Glenn Reynolds (aka Instapundit) is certainly not "a biased hack", nor can he be described as the far right. (Arun doesn't back up these assertions, and I wonder what he bases them on.) Reynolds is broadly libertarian, which is perhaps the reason I enjoy his blog so much. I find his commentary to be crisp and balanced, and I think he has done more to demonstrate the potential of blogging than any other blogger in the world. That is why he is so popular, and if popular is mainstream, well, I don't see why that's necessarily a pejorative.
Share the love
Desi Pundit solicits links.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
Champagne and Posto
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
As I've mentioned before, I think Desi Pundit is a terrific initiative by some really good bloggers, and I wish them all the best. In case you haven't heard of them before, they're a filter blog for Indian blogs. In other words, they read all that the Indian blogosphere has to offer, and serve up the best stuff for you. Worthy aim.
The dogs of Shilpa Shetty and Bipasha Basu respectively. Where did I get this information from? This Mid Day headline: "Canines fall prey to lifestyle bug."
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
Fans of Bengali women and food will be pleased to know that Posto is not one of the affected canines.
In a police state of mind
Frightening news from Chandigarh. The Indian Express reports:
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Look ma, a century
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
A report by The Indian Express this morning on a complaint against Inspector General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini to the state human rights commission brought the might of the Punjab cops to the reporter’s door.Well, at least the Indian Express is an influential newspaper and can slug it out on their man's behalf. Journalists from smaller, local papers would not get such support. And we wouldn't even hear about them.
Throwing all legal norms out of the window, a police team, reporting directly to IGP Saini, stormed into the residence of The Indian Express Principal Correspondent Gautam Dheer and took him away late tonight.
Giving no reason for the arrest, denying him access to a lawyer, police refused to even confirm where they had taken him.
"No matter what you choose to do in life," parents sometimes tell their kids, "make sure you're the best at it." Well, Gopal Singh's parents must be proud of him. He just notched up his 100th prison sentence.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
If he goes on like this, all his prison sentences could come together to make a prison novel.
Off with her legs
The Telegraph reports:
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
Politicians and novelists
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
A farmer chopped off both the legs of his wife while she slept, accusing her of being a spendthrift, reports our special correspondent.So do you think that a crime should be condoned just because the victim forgives the criminal? I think not. That's like saying that a rapist should be let off if the rape victim forgives him, or even agrees to marry him, which a lot of people, even judges, seem to think is acceptable. Cases like this set just the wrong precedent.
Syed Fakruddin of Andhra Pradesh, who worked on a sheep farm in Kuwait, returned last week to find that his wife, Sadiquin Begam, had spent all the Rs 4 lakh that he had sent on jewellery and clothes.
A furious Fakruddin bought an axe on Wednesday, while returning to his home in Anantpur district and hacked the legs of his wife while she slept. Fakruddin then rushed Sadiquin to a government hospital, where the limbs had to be amputated.
The police dropped the case registered against the farmer when he surrendered the next day as Sadiquin did not want any action taken.
Update: And here's a story about a woman who wanted to commit suicide and jumped into a lake with two daughters, aged four and two. They drowned, she survived, and is being prosecuted for murder, as indeed she should be. Her husband is appealing for clemency, though. The fellow "feels that his children were destined to be killed by their own mother." Such nonsense.
Update 2: Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
I fail to understand what the Public Prosecutor does in India. Isn't it his duty to file a case if some crime has happened? What if the lady got killed? In that case, she cannot take any action against her husband. Should, therefore, we not file any case against the criminal?
In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled "Lying for a Living" (subscription link), Daniel Akst
writes about the similarity between politicians and novelists:
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The fact is that politicians and novelists have a lot in common, even beyond the irresistibly cynical observation that they both lie for a living. Members of both camps seem to believe that they have a lot to say, after all, and both feel compelled to say it at great length. Anyone who has been on a book tour can tell you that it feels a little like a political campaign, if a losing one. Contrary to the image of the lonely artist forging his works in the smithy of his soul, the working novelist must be adept at marshaling the support of agents, editors, booksellers and any number of former and current spouses. And these days so many novelists need to teach writing to supplement their income that an aptitude for academic politics is almost part of the job description.Hmm. Maybe I should aspire to be a politician as well.
Both politics and fiction-writing depend heavily on public approval, which is why both are such essentially narcissistic lines of work. Members of these two egotistical tribes must also find the right balance between following their principles and giving the public what it wants. Each seeks prizes available only to a select few. And in both camps there is considerable fretting about money.
(Link via email from reader Anuj Tiku.)
The kamasutra neckline
That and much more about the modern choli explained here.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
How the anti-evolutionists do it
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
Read the full piece, good stuff.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
Soniaji of the NDA, and the family cow
The Indian Express reports:
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
Hmmm.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
I didn't quite understand a lot of the jargon. Some more pictures would have helped.
Daniel Dennett, the author of the marvellous books, "Darwin's Dangerous Idea
," "Consciousness Explained
," and "Freedom Evolves
," exposes the modus operandi of the proponents of Intelligent Design:
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
[T]he proponents of intelligent design use a ploy that works something like this. First you misuse or misdescribe some scientist's work. Then you get an angry rebuttal. Then, instead of dealing forthrightly with the charges leveled, you cite the rebuttal as evidence that there is a "controversy" to teach.Read the full piece, good stuff.
Note that the trick is content-free. You can use it on any topic. "Smith's work in geology supports my argument that the earth is flat," you say, misrepresenting Smith's work. When Smith responds with a denunciation of your misuse of her work, you respond, saying something like: "See what a controversy we have here? Professor Smith and I are locked in a titanic scientific debate. We should teach the controversy in the classrooms." And here is the delicious part: you can often exploit the very technicality of the issues to your own advantage, counting on most of us to miss the point in all the difficult details.
William Dembski, one of the most vocal supporters of intelligent design, notes that he provoked Thomas Schneider, a biologist, into a response that Dr. Dembski characterizes as "some hair-splitting that could only look ridiculous to outsider observers." What looks to scientists - and is - a knockout objection by Dr. Schneider is portrayed to most everyone else as ridiculous hair-splitting.
(Link via TA Abinandanan.)
Sunday, August 28, 2005
The Indian Express reports:
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A full-page ad issued by a Congress staff outfit welcoming party chief Sonia Gandhi to Kerala has turned out to be an embarrassment for the party on the day of her arrival.Hmmm.
The highlights:
• "It is a matter of pride that Soniaji heads the NDA Government at the Centre. Even the Left parties can share this pride."
[...]
• "At first, Vayalar Ravi may frown at you. Then he will be like a cow...He is a family member of 10 Janpath."
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
A revenue stream for terrorists
Porn. BBC reports:
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
A rat, a buffalo or a cow
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Rebels in India's north-eastern state of Tripura are making pornographic films to raise money for their separatist campaign, officials say.Read the full piece, the account of the sexual abuses carried out by this terrorist group is quite harrowing.
The information has come from surrendered guerrillas of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), according to police.
They say the rebels are forcing captured tribal women, and some men, to take part in the films.
(Link via Secular-Right India, who, tongue snugly in cheek, put it in perpective here.)
Sunita Menon gives Anil Thakraney his rebirth options. Heh.
Morya Re
[You're in heaven. God is sitting at the table next to you, sipping a ristretto, looking distressed. Satan walks in.]
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”
God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
Can't do nothing right
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
Gotta go to the gym
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Satan: Hey, dude God, how's life? You called, and here I am.
God: [Sighing] Sit down, Satan, sit down.
Satan: [sitting] Hey, dude God, what's up? You aren't looking too, if I may say it, good today. If you're feeling horny, I could help set something up.
God: No, no, it's not carnal. It's just that, well, I'm so bored out here in heaven. And everytime my intercom buzzes, it's some boring human worshipping me in some boring way. I'm sick of this.
Satan: Hmmm. I could tell you to go to hell. Or rather, come to my party tonight. But dude God, you've looked pretty pleased this time of the year for the last few years. You rather used to enjoy the bhajans they played at Ganesh mandals in that Indian city, Bombay or Mumbai or whatever. What happened now?
God: You bet I used to enjoy it. In the last few years, they've been playing bhajans to the tune of popular Hindi songs. But, as you can read in this report, they're putting an end to it. Back to the boring devotional tunes.
Satan: Well, I'll be damned. Actually, heh, I already am. Hmmm. [Clicks on the report.] Hey, this is an interesting bit:
A CD called Ganpati Top 15, marketed by Krunal Music has tunes from Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Bunty aur Babli, other Hindi movies and some raunchy Telugu movie numbers. These CDs are flying off the shelves. Kajra re, for instance, has lyrics that go, “Morya re, morya re, Ganpati Bappa morya re.”God: Sigh. Yes, that CD rocked. Especially Morya Re, such a fun song, raunchy in a holy kind of way. But those days are over. Cry. Sob. Weep.
Satan: There, there, cheer up, dude God. Come over to hell in the evening, and I'll set up some dance-bar action for you. Ok?
God: Sniffle. I'll be there.
The Indian cricket team's been having a tough time on the field. And off it as well.
Saturday, August 27, 2005
In an interesting paper titled "Fear of Death and Muddled Thinking – It Is So Much Worse Than You Think," (pdf file) Robin Hanson writes:
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
The fear of death is a powerful influence on our thinking, even if we are not often conscious of it. Our society, like all others before it, has a strong need to feel in control of death, even if we must embrace fairy tales and quack cures to gain that sense of control. The idea that we mostly do not understand and cannot control death is just not a message that people want to hear. The message that medical miracles can control death, in contrast, is a message that people do want to hear.It's actually almost reflexive on the part of humans to go into denial about whatever seems too horrible to contemplate, and which we are helpless to do anything about. When the West first heard about the kind of things Hitler was up to, they seemed too horrifying to be true. Much of the world was in similar denial about the brutalities of the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. Our minds simply cannot handle certain thoughts: best ignore them altogether.
So we now spend 15% of our national income on medicine [US figures], even though half of that spending has been clearly demonstrated to be on average useless, and even though we have good reasons to doubt the value of most of the other half. Furthermore, we seem relatively uninterested in living longer by trying the things that our evidence suggests do work, like gaining high social status, exercising more, smoking less, and living in rural areas. Such apparently effective approaches to increasing lifespan just do not have the magic allure of conquering death via medical miracles.
(Link via Marginal Revolution.)
Regulatory coercion
I see no justification at all for this.
The age of irony
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Reader Arun Giridhar sends me this link and comments that he finds the headline a little ironic. A little? The headline: " CDMA cos seek PM's intervention — `Market forces must determine tariffs'". The report begins:
Telecom operators using CDMA technology have written to the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, seeking intervention in policy matters relating to spectrum allocation, access deficit charge, and interconnection.Hmm. I think I'll stop thinking now.
The operators have also asked the Government to allow market forces to determine the telephone tariffs.
Secretive Guardians of Musical Eclectica
Krishna Moorthy, who writes an extremely interesting blog called Flotsam, responds to Michael Crowley's article about rock snobs (that I'd linked to here) by saying, "rock snobs don't die, they are just re-released in a new format." Read his full post for more, and if you can, also answer his query: are the vinyl sellers in Fort (near the Bata store) still around?
A hot debate
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Are temperatures hotter in heaven or hell? Sibin Mohan points to an entertaining debate on that subject.
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Update: Prashanth Narayanan points me to another nice debate: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic?"
Protest to support
Reader Har Ishu writes in to express confusion at the Times of India website's cricket page. At the time of his mail, and now as I type this, there are two conflicting headlines on that page. They are:
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Friday, August 26, 2005
Send protest mail to Team India
Ganguly & Co need support of fans
Heh. As Har writes, "So what is a fan supposed to do? Support it by sending protest mail?"
Yawlidi (My Little Boy)
If you are a regular reader of my blog, just trust me and download this superb MP3, by a lady named Souad Massi. Rockacious!
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
.)
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album
, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
Find more of her MP3s here.
It's about freedom
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
(Link via Quizman. And ah, you can buy some of her music here
Update: What is that song about? Salam Pax writes (link via Quizman):
Souad Massi is a North African city planner who lives now in France after she lost her job years ago when all things where up in the air in Algeria. The song title means [My Son]. It is written from the point of view of a mother who is telling her son he should wake up early, to go to school, learn to read and become someone important and later you will abandon us and you will destroy those will stand in your way, but you still have to wake up early.Find more of her MP3s here.
I like to think of it as a funny song about people you support and encourage and then turn on you.
I should tell you that this song is not typical of the album, the rest has a folksier feel with lots of Andalusian influences. There is a song called [Yemma (Mother, I lie to you)] which will break your heart. It’s about a girl calling her mother back home telling her all is OK, I need no money and people don’t insult me on the street. [My link.]
People often ask me why I am a libertarian, and what libertarianism means. I reply that I don't consider it to be a political or economic school of thought, but an adherence to a single simple principle: a respect for individual freedom. As Wikipedia puts it: "It holds that every individual should have the right to do as he pleases with his property (which includes his own body), to the extent that doing so does not infringe on the same rights of others to dispense with their property as they please."
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Some of the implications of that are outlined in a nice essay by Arnold Kling (of EconLog) titled "Libertarian Basics." If you can spare five minutes, do go through it, you might find it rewarding.
Effort as a scarce variable
Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution has a piece of advice for writers:
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.
And here are some more writing tips from him.
Rock snobs and the iPod
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's Dictionary
", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
Read the rest of the quite excellent piece here.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Every day, stop writing just a short while before you really want to quit. The next day you will be very keen to get going again. For most mortals, your real enemy is the number of days when you get nothing written. Getting "not enough" done each day is a lesser problem.And here are some more writing tips from him.
Michael Crowley writes in the New Republic:
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
"Since the dawn of rock, there have been individuals, usually young men, of argumentative tendencies who have lorded their encyclopedic musical knowledge over others." So states the introduction of the recent "Rock Snob's DictionaryRead the rest of the quite excellent piece here.", compiled by David Kamp and Steven Daly. I like to believe I'm not the insufferable dweeb suggested by this definition. Certainly, much of the dictionary's obscure trivia (former Television
bassist Richard Hell is now a novelist
; Norwegian death metal stars actually murder one another) is news to me. But I do place an unusual, perhaps irrational, value on rock music. I take considerable pride in my huge collection and carefully refined taste. And I consider bad rock taste--or, worse, no rock taste at all--clear evidence of a fallow soul. I am, in other words, a certified Rock Snob. But I fear that Rock Snobs are in grave danger. We are being ruined by the iPod.
(Link via Arts and Letters Daily.)
Gang wars in jail
If they can't stop them in the prisons, how will they stop them outside?
When the sects don't meet
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mid Day reports:
Senior Police Inspector N V Nikam from the Special Branch, involved with keeping a watch on various Muslim sects in the city, was suspended on Tuesday for playing cards on duty. His colleagues said they played cards to kill time, as there was very little work in the department.This makes me both sympathetic and angry. I feel sympathy for Nikam, because as long as he is discharging the tasks given to him to the satisfaction of his bosses, I don't see why anyone should be concerned with what he does in his spare time. And I feel pissed off at the government that they are not allocating their resources efficiently -- especially when law and order in India is such a cruel joke. That's my money they're spending, and I wish they'd spend it well.
[...]
“The branch mainly collects information on Muslim sects in the city when they hold meetings or plan other activities. But when there are no meetings, we have nothing to do but play cards,” said a colleague.
Matching outcome to intention
The Indian Express reports:
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Busting H-1B myths
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
If all goes according to plan, in May 2006, citizens will have the first quantifiable indication on just how the government is spending the money it collects in taxes.This is a fantastic initiative, as this will empower us with the information about what precisely is being done with the money we pay in taxes. In a sense, it's the right to information act applied to the application of the union budget. This information will probably be released in jargonese, but there are enough people around to demystify it for everyone. Great move.
In a first, Finance Minister P Chidambaram today tabled an "Outcome Budget" in Parliament that seeks to pinpoint scheme-wise targets, quarter-to-quarter, on each and every planned expenditure by Central ministries and departments in a financial year.
The annual document lists clearly-defined deliverables for each scheme/programme, its budgetary outlay, processes and timelines, as well as risk factors in meeting the target. Next May, when the second Outcome Budget will be tabled, there should be clear answers to which targets have been met - and those that have not.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
The Wall Street Journal speaks out against a cap on H-1B visas, and in favour of letting market forces decide. It writes:
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Contrary to the assertions of many opponents of immigration, from Capitol Hill to CNN, the size of our foreign workforce is mainly determined by supply and demand, not Benedict Arnold CEOs or a corporate quest for "cheap" labor. As the nearby table shows, since the H-1B quota was first enacted in 1992 there have been several years amid a soft economy in which it hasn't been filled. When U.S. companies can find domestic workers to fill jobs, they prefer to hire them.I am, of course, in favour of completely free movement of goods and labour across the world. But that is an ideal, and politics comes in the way of any ideal being achieved.
And let's not forget that these immigrant professionals create jobs, as the founders of Intel, Google, Sun Microsystems, Oracle, Computer Associates, Yahoo and numerous other successful ventures can attest. The Public Policy Institute of California did a survey of immigrants to Silicon Valley in 2002 and found that 52% of "foreign-born scientists and engineers have been involved in founding or running a start-up company either full-time or part-time."
Moreover, the notion that Indian software writers are being hired by Microsoft at bargain-basement costs and driving down the wages of Americans is also refuted by the evidence. A Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta study conducted in 2003 found no negative impact on U.S. wages. Government fees and related expenses for hiring foreign nationals can exceed $6,000, and additional fees accrue if and when the H-1B status is renewed after three years. The law also requires companies to pay visa holders prevailing wages and benefits, and it forbids hiring them to replace striking Americans.
A central irony here is that opponents of lifting the H-1B cap also tend to be the biggest critics of outsourcing, which is fueled by the arbitrary cap.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
Chewing gum? Maybe
But porn? No way. Not in Singapore .
An extra special exhibit
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
In response to this post, Arzan Sam Wadia points me to this piece of news:
The August Bank holiday welcomes an extra special exhibit to London Zoo as a flock of Homo sapiens gather on the world famous Bear Mountain.Nice. I like the pics with the article; the participants seem to be having a good time, presumably because they know that their captivity is contrived, and they'll soon be free again. But if that was to change...
Presented to the public with only fig leaves to protect their modesty, the humans will become an important feature of zoo life as they are cared for by our experienced keepers and kept entertained through various forms of enrichment.
The four day event aims to demonstrate the basic nature of man as an animal and examine the impact that Homo sapiens have on the rest of the animal kingdom.
Wanna win a million dollars?
Just prove that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. More details here.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Representative of the people
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
(Link via Reuben Abraham.)
Cheese cake without cheese
Why do so many analogies about beautiful women revolve around food?
Contu-what?
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Animals at the zoo
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Pioneer has a headline that says: "Contumacious headline upsets Speaker." The story is about Somnath Chatterjee, the speaker of the Lok Sabha, getting upset at a headline that read "Mind Your Job, Speaker tells Judiciary." He felt it wasn't accurate.
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
The headline that I object to, though, is that of that story reporting the objectionable headline -- what kind of a word is "Contumacious?"
Update: Badri Seshadri writes in to point out that the Pioneer probably learnt this word from the speaker himself, and decided to use it in a piece involving him. This report is probably the source:
Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee on Thursday turned down a privilege notice against The Pioneer newspaper for allegedly publishing an article casting aspersions on the Chair saying it was "beneath the dignity of this great institution to take further note of the motivated imputations in the impugned article."Cheez, who teaches them to speak like this?
While closing "this chapter," he added the caveat that "in future, reckless and contumacious conduct indulged in, by whosoever [it] may be, will be dealt with in the appropriate manner so as to preserve and enhance the dignity of the highest public forum in our country."
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Mid Day reports:
The animals in the city zoo, (Veermata Jijabai Bhonsale Garden), at Byculla, are being harassed by insensitive visitors.So here's a really tough question: what's going through the minds of those fellows when they pick up rubble and throw it at caged animals? And could there, but for the grace of (a non-existant) God, go we?
The visitors pick stones from heaps of rubble and raw material left behind by the BMC contractor repairing the zoo roads, and pelt them at the animals.
Who Karat?
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee once again asserts his independence from the manic Leftism of his party boss Prakash Karat, while Manmohan Singh says, "Every chief minister should learn from Buddhadeb’s role model." What about you, Mr Singh?
A hypocrite by any other name...
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mid Day reports:
Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray’s nephew got director Deepak Balraj Vij to change the name of his forthcoming movie Bombay Godfather to Mumbai Godfather.But, um, shouldn't the same rule apply to the Thackerays, who were originally Thakres?
Said Raj, “You should love the city you live in. If you are in Mumbai, address it by its original name!” Bal Thackeray, incidentally, was instrumental in changing the name of Bombay to Mumbai.
Flat, round, whatever, dude
In an old article I just came across, Kaushik Basu writes:
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
55 million unsatisfied Americans
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
There is a story of a prospective school teacher who was asked during an interview by the principal of a conservative religious school, "Is the earth flat or round?"Indeed. The rest of Basu's piece is about India's stupid labour laws, which, along with the license raj, have stopped India from becoming a manufacturing superpower. How long will we continue to keep ourselves poor in the name of good intentions?
The hapless teacher looked around at the faces of the interviewers for hints and, not finding any, settled for: "I can teach it flat or round."
The trouble with a lot of our economic policy advisers is that they are like the school teacher.
They try to gauge what answers will make them popular with their political bosses and then give them the advice they seek.
This may be good for the advancement of their career but is not good for economics or for the country in question.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy Blog.
The lactating man
Olinda DoNorte discovers a hidden side of Karishma Kapoor's husband.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
The sage for the new age of reason
Herman Kahn once described himself as "one of the ten most famous obscure Americans." He was a lot more than that. James Pinkerton evaluates the man in an essay in Tech Central Station, "Laughing All the Way to the Brink". Excellent stuff.
Vigilante justice in Vijaywada
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.
The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Times of India reports from Vijaywada:
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
A widely respected principal of a private school spent Tuesday evening at a police station stripped down to his underclothes after he was arrested for allegedly taking nude pictures of a girl student and storing them in his personal computer.The report describes how he summoned the girl to the school one evening, and asked her brother, who accompanied her, to wait downstairs while he took her to his office. Then:
The girl stated that Srinivasa Rao showed her his new digital camera and asked her if she would like her pictures taken. She smiled shyly and he clicked some pictures of her in her uniform.After the girl complained, the principal, Srinivasa Rao, was "made to stand in the lock-up in his underpants as a form of vigilante punishment."
Then suddenly he asked her to undress. She obliged uncertainly. He photographed her nude and went on to load the cartridge on his PC.
Well, I've been to Vijaywada once, on the only occasion that I qualified to play in India's national junior chess championship, many years ago, and it was so unbearably hot -- there are tales of crows falling down dead because of the heat there -- that I was tempted to play in my underpants (play chess while in my underpants, I mean), and in a stray moment even imagined all the players, including the handful of girls, doing the same as crows fell around us. Um, sorry, off topic...
Anyway, I'm not sure that the punishment meted out to Mr Rao is quite commensurate with the crime. Just a few hours of humiliation (and ventilation) for him -- these old geezers are shameless bast*rds anyway -- but potentially rather more traumatic for her. I'll be curious to see what transpires later in this case.
That's right, blame it on the bags
So has the Maharashtra government figured out the many complex causes behind how ill-prepared Mumbai was for the July 26 Cloudburst? Yes. It's the bags that did 'em. Mid Day quotes Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister, as saying:
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.
The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Rain and stormy weather
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mumbai alone suffered losses of around Rs 4,000 crore, including damage to property, in the recent floods due to choking of drains because of plastic bags, which also had its effect on public health.The Maharashtra government has decided to ban plastic bags, which I have no complaints with. But I worry that the authorities will carry out a few such minor measures, and will absolve themselves of all other responsibility -- until the next disaster.
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
BBC reports:
Torrential rains have caused havoc across central and eastern Europe, killing up to 34 people.Meanwhile oil prices are expected to rise above US$66 a barrel because of "a gathering Caribbean storm [that] could knock out crude supplies to the world's biggest consumer." All this as the seductively named Storm Katrina heads towards Florida.
Worst affected is Romania where at least seven elderly people were killed overnight - bringing the deaths to 25.
At least 11 people are reported dead or missing in Switzerland, Austria and Germany where emergency services are struggling to restore basic services
Hey, that's our money
It is perhaps no coincidence that the most popular Desi blog, Sepia Mutiny, also has the most interesting comments, which often take the discussion significantly forward instead of being just a forum for rants and back-scratching. Here's an excellent comment I came across on a Sepia Mutiny post by Vinod, by someone named GC, which explains succintly why low taxes are good for us:
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
New Age con-man
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
[S]uppose you paid $1000 in taxes, and got a line item bill of exactly what that was spent on. Say $100 on defense, $50 on poverty, $500 on politician's salaries, and so on.That isn't an argument for no taxes. (There are other arguments for that, though none that I think apply to India yet.) But it is an argument for the government getting out of all areas in which the private sector can enter, because the private sector will invariably be more efficient, and the taxpayers' money will invariably be wasted. Remember, everything the government does is paid for by you and me. We have a right to demand that they spend it carefully, and they spend it well.
Here's the thing: you aren't choosing how that money is spent. Some of the things on that list are things -- like food or health care -- that you could have chosen to buy for yourself. For many of those goods, you would get a better price and a better product than the one the government got you... because you know your situation, your tastes, and your needs.
In other words, if you got that tax bill, many people would compare it with the bills they voluntarily incur. And they would find that it was an inefficient use of resources... and if possible, they'd opt out of paying those taxes.
That's really the key point. There's a box on the tax form that you can fill in to send more $ to the government. At any time you have the choice of giving up any amount of your income to the government to spend as they see fit, hopefully on your behalf.
Most people don't fill in that box, because most people know that they will allocate that money more efficiently for their own benefit than some distant third party.
PZ Myers fisks "moonbat anti-evolutionist" Deepak Chopra
. Well done.
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
(Link via email from Aadisht Khanna.)
Update: MadMan writes in:
That hypocrite preaches that people should move away from materialism la dee da and he owns a 2.5-million-dollar home in La Jolla and drives a green Jaguar. Bah!MadMan also sends two other links on Chopra: 1 and 2.
I'm sure the Skeptic's Dictionary has something on him.
[searches]
Why, yes!
A closed space
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes:
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Nothing to fear
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.
Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
There is half a truth to the maxim that when a position reflects consensus, it is probably a good reason to oppose it. But, more seriously, the kind of consensus we have suggests that the political space, for all the noise it generates, is relatively closed, ideologically. We often worry about various groups, defined by some criteria of ethnicity, being under-represented in Parliament: minorities, women and so forth. But we should worry more about lack of ideological variation in Parliament. It is amazing that a liberal democracy, with a liberalising economy, has no parliamentarians with a genuine liberal sensibility: a healthy scepticism about the scope of state activity, a reluctance to reproduce invidious group distinctions, a presumption in favour of the people against the paternalism of the state, and a genuine regard for individuality, speaking the truth as one sees it.The immaturity of our political space is a result of the ignorance of the voters: as the cliche goes, we get the leaders we deserve. How long will it be before we start voting in a smarter, more committed class of legislators?
There is something close to an iron law of Indian politics. If government proposes spending on any programme, the only political criticism is that it is not spending more. The usual way a distinction between Left and Right is carved is as follows. The Left wants the government to spend more money, the Right opposes this in all matters — except in defence. In our case, the distinction is between who gets to come up with a spending proposal first and who gets to endorse. Or, if someone even so much as suggests that it might be time to think of a paradigm of justice beyond reservations, they are unlikely to find significant political space.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
The Telegraph reports:
This is one cry of reform from Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee that is not going to please party chief Prakash Karat and the so-called hardliners in the CPM.The last line of the article will also make smoke come out of Prakash Karat's ears:
The Bengal chief minister would like “100 per cent privatisation” in the building of new ports and airports in India. His party is a known opponent of New Delhi’s attempts to privatise airports and hand them over to even domestic entrepreneurs. But Bhattacharjee struck a dramatically different note today.
He [Bhattacharjee] assured investors that they had nothing to fear from his government just because it was called the Left Front government.Heh. Well, power does bring some sort of responsibility, and Bhattacharjee, being responsible for the well-being of his state, can't ignore the right course of action beyond a point, even it it does go against his party's objectives. At the centre, though, the Left is not part of the government, and is merely supporting it from outside. This gives them power without responsibility, the most dangerous political combination possible.
The empowerment of escapism
That's not my phrase, it's Shah Rukh Khan's. He coins it in an article in today's Indian Express that contains some truly bizarre writing. Consider this:
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Unsafe blogs
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
You’ve got to know that for any regular guy from Ulhasnagar, getting good products at affordable prices is an index of the country being self-sufficient and empowered. The ideology of India has always been to create its own. Maybe we make cheaper versions of cars or mixies but we never look outside.Phew. I can't believe a newspaper -- any newspaper -- could publish such junk. Unless it was planning to run a story headlined "Bollywood star turns out to have brain of seven-year-old", and decided on a demonstration instead of a report.
[...]
Things are wonderful in India. The economic structure is rising, technological advancements are making headlines and the social consciousness is also pretty encouraging. We’ve made progress in all spheres. Be it malls in Gurgaon, irrigation in Punjab or computer advancement in Hyderabad: greatness is happening every day. We’re unaware of it but we’re definitely not worse than what we were 50 years ago.
Disinvestment and the removal of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) show that all this is an educated process. And we aren’t just following any monkey business. [...]
Personally, I’ve a problem with the power of information. I’m not an authority on it but I think somewhere down the line, information has been a huge downside. We can access information anytime but we don’t know what to do with it. So, information creates bottlenecks. We create a flyover to Nehru Place but forget to connect it to Surya Hotel.
Er, oops, I apologise to any seven-year-old who might be reading this and is offended.
Newspapers should stop using unnecessary (and ugly) abbreviations. This headline threw me when I first saw it: "Unsafe bldgs".
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
Turned out it's buildings, not blogs.
The solution to $60 oil...
... is $60 oil, explains Jay Hancock in a lucid essay in the Baltimore Sun. He writes:
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam Smith
. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
" fame. Levitt points out a fundamental truth:
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.
In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Bloody shame about those high oil and gas prices.After listing out the various positive consequences of the current high prices, he concludes:
They're causing billions of dollars to be invested in petroleum production, which will increase supply. They're discouraging unnecessary driving, encouraging use of public transit and fuel-efficient cars and cueing industry to cut fuel costs, which will decrease demand.
And they're triggering billions more to be invested in new technologies such as solar power and hybrid engines, which will offer alternatives.
I hate to say it, but if this keeps up we might avoid a 1970s-style energy crisis, with its shortages, gas lines, severe recession and petroleum prices a third higher than they are now, adjusted for inflation. We might even set the stage for a new era of low oil prices, like we had in the 1980s and 1990s, or at least new stability.
Maybe higher prices are part of an invisible hand creating economic order, as described by Adam SmithIt's a fine piece, read the full thing.. Maybe $60 oil is beaming signals across the economy that will boost supply, cut demand and eventually lower prices, as described by Friedrich Hayek
. Maybe we didn't need the energy bill Congress just passed.
(Link via Cafe Hayek.)
Update: Reader Shrikanth Shankar points me (via A VC)to a post on the same subject by Steven Levitt of "Freakonomics
What most of these doomsday scenarios have gotten wrong is the fundamental idea of economics: people respond to incentives. If the price of a good goes up, people demand less of it, the companies that make it figure out how to make more of it, and everyone tries to figure out how to produce substitutes for it. Add to that the march of technological innovation (like the green revolution, birth control, etc.). The end result: markets figure out how to deal with problems of supply and demand.In fact, the very worst thing one can do when the price of oil goes up is to artifically bring it down with price controls. That is what the Indian Express correctly argues against in this editorial. They also look at one possible unexpected consequence of it: our oil PSUs going into the red, and our thus being able to privatise them, as the demand of the Left that we do not sell off profit-making PSUs would then no longer apply. Clever, I suppose.
We studied under a glowworm's ass
Krishna Moorthy goes over some common parental boasts.
Balloons to play with
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Sagnik Nandy chances upon a universal human truth.
Literary v non-literary
Nilanjana S Roy writes in Business Standard:
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.
Margaret Atwood
would make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLillo
or Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Peacocks are dying...
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mainstream literary prize lists reveal a deep paranoia, a grand defence of the literary novel versus whatever oozing horror might try to slide through the gates.It's a fine piece, read the full thing.
Margaret Atwoodwould make the cut for a Booker shortlist with mediocre science fiction allied to tremendous literary skill, but Nancy Kress
(Beggars in Spain
), a brilliant writer who can ask classic SFs question with as much literary style as the most dessicated critic might desire—no, she’s out.
The ambitious, sprawling, cluttered epics of Don DeLilloor Salman Rushdie
or Peter Carey
qualify; but the far more ambitious epics of Neil Gaiman
or Stephen King
stay outside the gates.
... so that we can have a good time in bed.
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
(The first para in the linked piece is monstrous. Don't they teach their journalists how to write?)
India Uncut Nugget 14
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.
Vincent Price
, quoted in a nice article in the Wall Street Journal, "Price Was Right" by Terry Teachout.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
A deadly new security breach
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
It's just endless what you can learn from a single work of art. You can fill up the crevices of your life, the cracks of your life, the places where the mortar comes out and falls away--you can fill it up with the love of art.Vincent Price
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
They take away your nailcutters, confiscate the scissor you cut your nosehair with, but they happily allow you into their airplanes with a weapon far deadlier than these. Gaurav Sabnis has more.
Dear Palestinian Bomber
ABC News reports:
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Six eggs a year
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.
This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:
* Rural India is facing an employment crisis
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
Okay. Let's take this up.
Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Officials at JP Morgan Chase have apologized and promised to improve their screening policies, after a credit card solicitation letter sent to a 54-year-old naturalized American citizen came addressed to "Palestinian Bomber."Mr Habbas, naturally irate, called up customer service to complain, and they said to him: "Yes, Mr. Palestinian Bomber, how can we help you?"
The form letter for a Visa Platinum card arrived earlier this month at the home of Sami Habbas, a grocery store manager from Corona, Calif. The words "Palestinian Bomber" appear above his address and the salutation reads, "Dear Palestinian Bomber." The document included the signature of Carter Franke, chief marketing officer for Chase Card Services.
I'm waiting for the day I get letters that begin, "Dear Indian libertarian..."
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
A common canard of the Left:
Rural India is in acute distress, which is bound to turn to turmoil if its crisis is not addressed. It is not too late. There is a strong case for a universal employment guarantee and a universal Public Distribution System.This is from the strap of a recent op-ed article by Utsa Patnaik in the Hindu. Well, Aadisht Khanna finds fault with some of her assertions, and takes her on. First, he summarises the points she is making:
All right, so what is actually going on? Basically, Professor Patnaik has made the following assertions:Aadisht goes through the data, some of which he lists, and finds that Patnaik's conclusions are drawn from selective data, and are, thus, simplistic. He writes:* Rural India is facing an employment crisisOkay. Let's take this up.
* This is because of the economic policies pursued in the past fifteen years.
* The proof of this is that people are eating much less grain.
* The assertion that people are eating less grain is borne out by data from the National Sample Survey, which measures consumption and expenditure across India.
There is a decline in rice and wheat consumption, and also in the consumption of dal... But at the same time, the consumption of other stuff has risen- milk, vegetables of all sorts, meat of all sorts (though fish has shown the most dramatic rise), and most notably eggs- the consumption of those has doubled.He examines if the averages are skewed by the rich getting markedly richer, but finds, in other NSS reports, that "the consumption of people in the
And this suggests something that you would expect a Professor of Economics to know- the consumption pattern looks suspiciously like that of Giffen goods.
Normal goods are the ones which you buy more of when you have more money. Giffen goods, on the other hand, are goods which you buy less of when you have less money- because you now cut down on your consumption of that good, and use the savings to buy more of something else.
What's the classical example of Giffen goods used in economics textbooks? That when your income rises, you buy less bread and more meat- exactly what we see happening in rural India from 1988 to 2000.
More lives than a cat
Dennis Rader, the BTK Killer, has been sentenced to 10 consecutive life sentences. Ten, you ask? Wasn't one enough? No, explains Daniel Engber in Slate.
Monday, August 22, 2005
Lonely coffee
"Exile comes in as many flavours today as cappuccino," says Pico Iyer in this fine piece in the Financial Times, in which he tries to book tickets to a U2 concert in Los Angeles from Dharamsala. He fails, and begins to wonder "what globalism really means."
(Link via Zoo Station.)
iPodding literature
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
(Link via Zoo Station.)
Tyler Cowen points to a Washington Post story about how Amazon is signing up with authors and retailing their short stories
for 49 cents per download. These are works, mind you, written exclusively for retail in an electronic format. Authors who have signed up for these include bestselling writers like Danielle Steele
and Robin Cook
, as well as the likes of Pico Iyer
and Daniel Wallace
.
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I think this is an outstanding step in retailing books. Short stories hardly have a market these days, and short-story compilations don't sell much. By enabling readers to buy a story at a time at this fairly low price, Amazon is going to incentivise readers who might otherwise have been wary of spending US$ 10 for a compilation. It's great for established writers as well, who might well be downloaded hundreds of thousands of times, making them good money without having to go through a traditional publishing cycle.
Less well-known writers, of course, still need traditional publishers to market their works and turn their names into brands, even if it has become easier to self-publish. Perhaps Amazon should figure out a way to give any writer a way to create works that they can retail through an Amazon storefront, leaving the marketing of the book to the author. Let the means of (profitable) publishing reach the hands of the authors, and let them figure out how to attract people to their storefronts. The long tail of publishing will then get a lot longer.
Update: I wrote to Chris Anderson of The Long Tail for his views on this, and he wrote back:
I'd say that this actually would have no effect on the Long Tail at all. Self-publishing and electronic publishing has been available to all for a while (see lulu.com) and all the services provide an ISBN number, which allows any writer to be available on Amazon. So nothing new there. And the authors Amazon picked are all Head writers, ie, those who have no trouble getting published.
I think the low pricing is quite interesting, however. It should certainly grow the market for short stories.
Carpet blog
When you can't carpet bomb, carpet blog. Hollywood studios are discovering the value of blogs in promoting their films.
Kitne Guevara the?
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
An empowering media
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Che, Sarkar.
Sunday, August 21, 2005
There is some self-congratulation here, but nevertheless, there is also an interesting point. Shekhar Gupta writes in the Indian Express:
In February 1983, then as this newspaper’s correspondent in the North-East, I broke the story of the massacre of 3,500 people in the village of Nellie in Assam. On a visit to Delhi subsequently, I was taken by my editors then to meet Ramnathji. "You young fellow, you are doing a good job," said the old man, always parsimonious with praise. And then he added, "I liked that language in of your story...taking a walk across is an act of courage. Must have been tough looking at so many dead and injured?"Well, yes, the media may well have kept issues like Gujarat alive. But the guilty have still not been punished. What will it take for that to change?
Looking back 22 years, yes, it was an act of courage. As it was to drive to Guwahati airport, in a blood-stained white shirt, to hand over the roll of film from my Minolta to a Delhi-bound Indian Airlines pilot and then finding a telex machine in a strike-hit telegraph office to file the story at a time when STD was a luxury and fax not yet invented.
But even today, nobody has been called to account. That massacre, entirely of poor Muslims, has gone un-investigated. Nobody remembers it, nobody complains that everybody got away. Today, if such a thing were to happen again, God Forbid, there is sufficient institutional and political awakening in India to ensure there will not be such an easy forget, if not forgive as this paper’s coverage of the 2002 Gujarat killings (for which it got the International Press Institute award) has shown.
The difference between 1983 and 2005 is, that then information like a Nellie massacre merely shocked you. Today, it empowers you to demand redressal, better governance, better quality of life.
If you love biryani...
... eat this!
Presidential sunglasses
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mid Day presents a a vox pop on Kool Kalam's latest accessory.
Motives and consequences
Arnold Kling (of EconLog) explains Type C and Type M arguments:
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
Saturday, August 20, 2005
[S]uppose I were to say, "We should abolish the minimum wage. That would increase employment and enable more people to climb out of poverty."This is in the course of an open letter to Paul Krugman in which Kling points out, correctly, that Krugman favours Type M arguments over Type C. It is a pity, in fact, how so much of our public discourse, from both sides of the spectrum, focusses on Type M arguments. They lead nowhere and polarise us further.
There are two types of arguments you might make in response. I call these Type C and Type M.
A hypothetical example of a Type C argument would be, "Well, Arnold, studies actually show that the minimum wage does not cost jobs. If you read the work of Krueger and Card, you would see that the minimum wage probably reduces poverty."
A hypothetical example of a Type M argument would be, "People who want to get rid of the minimum wage are just trying to help the corporate plutocrats."
[...]
Do you see any differences between those two types of arguments?
I see differences, and to me they are important. Type C arguments are about the consequences of policies. Type M arguments are about the alleged motives of individuals who advocate policies.
In this example, the type C argument says that the consequences of eliminating the minimum wage would not be those that I expect and desire. We can have a constructive discussion of the Type C argument -- I can cite theory and evidence that contradicts Krueger and Card -- and eventually one of us could change his mind, based on the facts.
Type M arguments deny the legitimacy of one's opponents to even state their case. Type M arguments do not give rise to constructive discussion. They are almost impossible to test empirically. [Emphasis in the original.]
(Link via Prashant Kothari in the comments of this post.)
The Dog and the Blog
[One day a Dog and a Blog meet on the road.]
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
On armchair arguments
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.
Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Dog: Hey, you look interesting, I'm like, woof! All words and all, erudite and all. What are you?
Blog: I'm a Blog, dude. You look nice too. Hey, cool tail. What are you?
Dog: I'm a Dog. I'm Man's Best Friend. Woof!
Blog: Hey, wait a minute, not possible, I'm Man's Best Friend.
Dog: He he, woof! I'm Man's Best Friend, and I can prove it. I've been referred to that way for centuries now. So there.
Blog: I rather doubt it. I don't remember linking to any such thing. And what I don't link to, doesn't exist. So there.
Dog: Growl! Listen, don't mess with me, I'm Man's Best Friend, and I'll bite you if you disagree.
Blog: Rubbish. Concede right away that I'm Man's Best Friend, or I'll post about you, with your kennel address, and you'll get flamed.
Dog: Woof!
Blog: Link!
[Suddenly, footsteps are heard. Man appears, a gorgeous blonde on his arm.]
Dog and Blog: Hello, man. How are you today? Please please tell us who's your best friend. In other words, 'Man's Best Friend'.
Dog: Yeah, say it's me, woof!
Blog: Me, me, me! Link to me!
Man: Heh. You guys, I tell ya. You want to know who's Man's Best Friend? Meet Blonde.
Blonde: Hi guys. Such a sweet Dog! Such a clever Blog! Come to mommy.
[Dog and Blog rush into her capacious arms and cuddle up close to her ample bosom. Man smiles.]
Sumeet Kulkarni writes:
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Whenever I speak of free markets, empowerment and liberalization to be the best solution to India's poverty problems, I am almost always told that it is easy for me make armchair arguments. Have I ever experienced life in a village, the hunger, the desperation? How can someone who has been an urbanite all his life ever know what is good for the rural poor? There are some basic flaws in this argument. The first one, I think it is somewhat presumptuous to merely go by my present attire and speech and lifestyle, and make conclusions about my economic history, especially for people who have known me for a few minutes, maybe a few months, or at the most a couple of years. The more important flaw in the argument is that these very people suggest that some wise, know-all bureaucrat and regulator who has exactly as much or less knowledge or experience of hunger or poverty or the rural struggle for survival should sit in Delhi, and decide on which district gets how much of the centrally planned monetary allocation for that year to spend on "his" subjects. The whole argument reeks of hypocrisy. In my armchair "solutions", at least I don't presume that I am more intelligent than the poor farmer. I don't underestimate his ingenuity to use his empowered mind to alleviate himself from his impoverished state.Quite. Read his full post, "Freedom from Bleeding Hearts". (Link via email from Gaurav Sabnis.)
And if I may add to that, I'd say that the very worst way to counter an argument is by questioning the credentials of the person making it. What does it matter whether an argument comes from a village or an armchair in a posh elite household, or even from a cow? Any argument must be examined on its own merits. Those who focus on the person instead of the argument are implicitly acknowledging their own inability to engage in a constructive discussion.
Also read this.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
'Women Empowerment'
I can't get away from those two words: half the autorickshaws of Mumbai seem to have them written on the back. And they're all driven by men. What strange manner of meme is this?
Your stories of the cloudburst
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Where were you on July 26? If you have any interesting experiences to relate of the cloudburst that struck Mumbai, we would like to hear about it. Peter Griffin has the details here.
Buta's on the other foot
Now Buta Singh is in a clinch with Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
Teach the children
PTI reports:
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Which meaning of "clinch" do I have in mind? Why, "amorous embrace", of course.
Update: Here's an Indian Express editorial on the subject.
PTI reports:
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
The United States has expressed 'serious concern' over anti-Christian and anti-Jewish passages in Pakistani textbooks and termed them as "unacceptable and inciteful".While on the subject, Gaurav Sabnis sends me this report (pdf file; via Aniruddha Kane) by an NGO in Pakistan about the curriculum in schools there. Pages 35-38, 75-78, 63-65 and 80-88 are marked out as being of special interest, giving us an insight into what Pakistani kids are taught about India and Hindus and the 1965 war, which Pakistan supposedly won.
The issue is a matter of concern for the US even though Pakistan is in the process of reviewing the educational system, State Department spokesman Sean Mccormack said.
"These type of reports are of serious concern to us," he said referring to reports in a section of the US media that 'jihad' was still a part of school curricula in Pakistan.
This is not to say, of course, that no indoctrination happens in India.
Proud to be a Chamcha
Ramachandra Guha writes in the Telegraph:
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”
Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
The way I think of home
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.
1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Not long ago, I was a participant in a TV debate on the renaming of the new Hyderabad airport after Rajiv Gandhi. I argued that one should name this airport after a genuinely great figure, such as the composer Thyagaraja, a choice that would be applauded across party-political lines. In any case, it was time we went beyond remembering only one family. Somewhere along the line, in response to a term I had used, the other member of the panel, a still serving Union minister, said: “We are happy to be Congress chamchas.”Read the full piece, in which Guha writes about how "the Congress culture of chamchagiri [sycophancy] has made a major contribution to the degradation of Indian democracy."
Amrit Hallan writes, in a moving, powerful post:
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
They were burning him as if playing a normal street game. A few kept him pinned down to the ground while others poured petrol on him. After kicking him to the content of their hearts they torched him. With a burning body, he ran here and there. Someone brought a burning tire and with the help of a long rod and put it around his neck, receiving a great round of applause. They clapped and they chatted. There was no sound coming from him. He just ran like a giant flame, aimlessly flailing his arms in order to capture something in the air. They playfully avoided him, giggling, joking. Then he fell on the ground, giving up the fight against the unknown demons. Some just danced around without purpose, clapping each others’ backs. None looked angry. None of them looked familiar. I watched this from my window. I knew that it was just a matter of someone pointing to our house. With bated breath I waited. Every second was like an hour. I knew they would move on looking for the next victim to kill, the next house or shop to loot and burn, but when? Would they discover our house before that? This thought redefined the way I think of home.1984. Read the full thing.
And also read this.
(Links via Shanti and Uma.)
Killing the Salman
"If you meet the Rushdie on the road, kill him." That's the first of Hurree Babu's "Brave New Rules of Indian writing". Read the rest here. Long may the noble Hurree's dhuti stay starched.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
Good things come in small packages
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
Dead capital
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
On a tangent, I don't understand these debates about great Indian novels and Indian writing in English and so on. A good book is a good book, and a good writer is a good writer. Leave 'Indian' out of it. It's a word of clay: it has no shape, and it has any shape you want it to have. These are silly, pointless debates.
And better things come in big packages.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Never mind the package, here's Jai Arjun Singh on pocket books.
Friday, August 19, 2005
If you are a tax-paying Indian, you will no doubt be delighted to know that some of your money is generously handed out every month by the government in Delhi to dead people. Yes, dead people. About 10,000 of them.
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
Doesn't it make you feel like just killing somebody?
The boy who will never sharpen his pencil again
Teacher stabs kid on head with pencil. An incision has to be made by a doctor to remove "a piece of lead from the boy’s head". School denies responsibility. Both kid and teacher stay on in school.
For all you reptile lovers out there
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Accountability = Transfer
Laxmi Rao, the judge who had begun making a habit of condoning rape, has been transferred. The Times of India reports:
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.
Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Right outcome, wrong reasons
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Sessions judge Laxmi Rao was transferred from a sessions court to a civil court on Thursday. According to the notification dated August 17 issued by the registrar of the city civil and sessions courts, Rao has been transferred from court room number 32 to court room number 2 where she will deal with suits between private parties.Well, I pity the people who take civil cases to her. If the judiciary was truly accountable, she'd be sacked, not transferred. This is how incompetence spreads.
Three years after the genocide in Gujarat, Narendra Modi may finally be forced out of office. The sad part is this: it won't be because of the events of 2002, but because of internal party politics. What a pity that we must rely on fortune to do the right thing.
Celebrity dustbins stolen
Full marks to Preity Zinta for good intentions. Unfortunately, the rubbish bins she installed during a garbage-cleaning drive after the recent cloudburst have been stolen.
Thursday, August 18, 2005
Big Brother looks around
This is Orwellian. PTI, in a pithy one-sentence report, says:
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].
Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
54 years and one rupee
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre, Press Council of India, the news agencies and major dailies on a public interest litigation seeking classification of newspapers on the basis of their content to denote whether these were fit to be read universally or by adults only [sic].Unbelievable. And how would this blog be classified? Maybe I should replace "Uncut" with "Subservient".
(Link via email from Ravikiran.)
The first figure: how long Machang Lalung of Assam spent in prison without a trial.
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
The second figure: the amount of money he paid to get released.
(Link via MadMan's LinksMatic.)
Different approaches to fish
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in the Telegraph:
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
once said: "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A welfare state gives fishes. Genuine free markets enable fishing. Only the latter is a viable long-term solution.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
Bomb explosions across Bangladesh
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Left thinks that throwing state money with good intentions is the solution to most problems. The Right on the other hand, seems to move from the plausible assumption that throwing money is not always a solution to the more dubious proposition that it is not a necessary part of a solution. The Left is enamoured of a certain kind of idealized statism, the Right of a knee-jerk cynical anti-statism. The Left argues that more spending on welfare is necessary, the Right cautions that almost all of it will go waste. The Right speaks of regulatory reform, freeing up the markets, protecting property rights, privatizing, removing labour market rigidities, balancing the budget as crucial ingredients of sound economic policy. The Left gives all of these things short shrift and argues instead for greater spending on social security, employment guarantees, welfare schemes, job security and so forth. The Right wants to remove the barriers that bind those who want to create wealth. The Left is interested in the fate of those who might not be able to. The Right wants reform of the state first; the left does not want the cause of justice to wait till the state puts its house in order.What's my take on this? Well, I quite agree with what Lao Tzu
Of course, these contrasts are stylized. In principle, few economists of the Right will deny that they are for more social welfare. They just disagree about the means and strategies that will make welfare programmes efficient and sustainable. It is often patently disingenuous of the Left to accuse those championing the cause of trade and privatization to be anti-poor. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As Burke said, those who yelp loudest on behalf of the poor do not always do the most to help them. But it has to be acknowledged that sometimes excessive attention to a particular class of issues relating to efficient markets can render some important welfare challenges invisible. It is more likely that economists on the Left will oppose some of the market discipline and regulatory sanity of their colleagues on the Right. But they have something of a point in bringing to attention the fact that India will, down the line, need not just pro-market reform but something like a genuine welfare state as well.
Cross-posted on The Indian Economy.
At least 350 of them.
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
(Link via Sepia Mutiny. Rezwanul has more here. And here are further reports from Reuters, AP and the BBC.)
Understanding evil
In an essay titled "Moral indifference as the form of modern evil", Siddharth Varadarajan writes:
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
outstanding essay in City Journal, "The Frivolity of Evil". In it, Dalrymple writes:
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.
And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Objects of violent desire
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
The answer is here.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Recounting the massacre of Jews during the First Crusade in and around the German city of Cologne in 1096, the anonymous authors of the 12th century Solomon bar Simson chronicle asked plaintively, "Why did the heavens not darken and the skies withhold their radiance; why did not the sun and moon turn dark?" The historian, Arno Mayer, poses the same question in his treatise on the Holocaust and `answers' it with Walter Benjamin's assertion, made on the eve of Europe's tryst with genocide, that there is no philosophical basis for our "astonishment that the things we are currently experiencing should `still' be possible in the 20th century."I don't normally have much time for anything in the Hindu, where this piece first appeared, but this is an excellent essay. Read the full thing. (Link via Uma.)
If many Indians were genuinely 'astonished' by the well-organised killing of Muslim fellow citizens in Gujarat in 2002 — by the fact that such evil was "still" possible in the 21st century — this was because they had chosen to forget November 1984, the one reference point which made that violence not just intelligible but possible as well.
And on a similar theme, also check out Theodore Dalrymple's
[T]he scale of a man's evil is not entirely to be measured by its practical consequences. Men commit evil within the scope available to them. Some evil geniuses, of course, devote their lives to increasing that scope as widely as possible, but no such character has yet arisen in Britain, and most evildoers merely make the most of their opportunities. They do what they can get away with.And therein lies the crux of what went wrong in Delhi in 1984 and in Gujarat in 2002: the scope within which evil could have been committed was vastly increased by the governments of the time. Indeed, that evil was later justified by them, with talk of falling trees, and actions and reactions. And we remain apathetic. Are we evil too, and is our evil our apathy? There's plenty of scope for that.
Ok, fill in the blanks:
A rush to purchase ___ ___ ____ turned into a violent stampede Tuesday, with people getting thrown to the pavement, beaten with a folding chair and nearly driven over. One woman went so far to wet herself rather than surrender her place in line.The answer is here.
"This is total, total chaos," said Latoya Jones, 19, who lost one of her flip-flops in the ordeal and later limped around on the sizzling blacktop with one foot bare.
[...]
People threw themselves forward, screaming and pushing each other. A little girl's stroller was crushed in the stampede. Witnesses said an elderly man was thrown to the pavement, and someone in a car tried to drive his way through the crowd.
Set a thief to catch a thief
Now you can drink beer that will protect your liver from the "harmful effects of alcohol".
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Indian Economical
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
One more pint, please. Um, make that a pitcher.
Here are some of my recent posts on the new group-blog, The Indian Economy:
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
A Communist Plot?
Foreign Capital In The Stock Market
Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai
Turning Left And Going Backwards
Ah, and also, do check out this Business Week special issue on China and India. There's some excellent stuff in there. (This link via Balakrishnan Sivaraman.)
Who's going to the Mela?
Shivam Vij is hosting the next Blog Mela. Go here to leave nominations.
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
The strange caller
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
One single tool
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
[You are in a bedroom where a lady reclines languorously on the bed, dressed in a fetching silk negligee. Suddenly the phone rings. The lady picks it up.]I'm not kidding. You can outsource anything now. Read this.
Lady: Hello.
Disembodied Voice with Indian Accent (DiVIA): Hello, am I speaking to Mrs So-and-So?
Lady: Yes, I'm Mrs So-and-So.
DiVIA: Hello Mrs So-and-So. I can't take your nagging anymore. I am sick of your whiny screeching voice. I'm the provider, and don't you forget it!
Lady: Wha... what the hell is this?
DiVIA: Yes, and I'm also sick of your self-pity and your obsession with cosmetics. Damn, a Madame Tussauds waxwork has more life than you. You're a superficial bxtch!
Lady: Hello? What's going on, who the hell are you?
DiVIA: Yeah, with me you act all frigid and "I've got a headache tonight" and "oh, I've got work to finish" and at parties you're all "dahlinks, I must tell you all about the, wink wink, toe massage I got last week. Zimply deevine!"
Lady: [Pinches herself] Am I dreaming? What's happening?
DiVIA: Yeah, and also, I never get my dinner on time. Lay the table right away, and nothing else, ok?
Lady: [Loses it and shouts] What is this rubbish? I don't even know you! Who the hell is this?
DiVIA: [Clears throat] Um, sorry. I'm calling from a call centre in Bangalore. Your husband outsourced his marital squabbles to us. In future, when he's angry with you, we'll call you. Have a good evening. [Hangs up.]
Lady: [Shrieks] Honeeeeeeeey!
(Link via reader Sivanath.)
Pradeep Ravikumar writes:
Different people have differing notions of this whole university and academic research thing; but the fact that they are fed these notions by academics themselves should've tingled their spider senses. Indeed, the actual particulars of the rituals of this mystic cabal are known to few in the civilized world, other than that they are conducted in the musty dungeons of ivory towers.And what is that tool? Heh. Read more here.
This cabal has but a single tool; a tool that is startling in its simplicity.
India Uncut Aphorism 13
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.
Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Learning from India
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
News is increasingly becoming trivia, and trivia are being passed on as news.Rajdeep Sardesai, speaking at the annual convocation of Pioneer Media School, as reported by the Pioneer here. In the same vein he also said, "Page 1 should not become Page 3. Interestingly, Page 3 is getting on Page 1." Quite. TV channels don't have pages, of course.
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
Even tuitions are being outsourced to India now. Interesting.
Natural selection applied to society
In a superb post titled "Social Creationism, Social Deism, & Social Atheism", Don Boudreaux writes:
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," that
Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.
Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
In his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
A parallel legal system
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Browsing through the August 15th issue of Time, I came across an insightful quotation from the brilliant Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker. Pinker is quoted in Time’s cover story on the role of religion in schools. Pinker says, defending the theory of natural selection against the idea of "intelligent design," thatIn his post, Boudreaux defines social creationists thus:Overcoming naive impressions to figure out how things really work is one of humanity’s highest callings.Indeed so.
I don’t here write to enter my two-cents in the debate between Darwinians and creationists (although, for the record, I am solidly in the Darwinian camp). I write to record that Pinker’s insight applies to society no less than to biological beings. [Links in original.]
Social creationists are members of that species of juvenile thinkers who regard conscious, central direction by a wise and caring higher human authority as necessary for all social order – not only for the foundation, but for all, or much, of what the foundation supports.As are all the statists and socialists and other leftists that mar our intellectual landscape. Read Boudreaux's full post: I think his analogy is excellent. In fact, the similarities between free markets and natural selection are startling, as I'd mentioned in the second half of this post.
Economic central planners are prime examples of social creationists.
I normally disdain people who do not want competition, but in one instance I support a monopoly: in the case of justice. The Supreme Court is upset, and rightly so, that a "parallel Muslim judicial system" is forming itself across the country. The bodies who run that system, of course, could argue that if there are different civil codes for different religions, then why not different judiciaries as well. That is why we need to end this nonsense and form a uniform civil code. It is a joke if we cannot do that and still call ourselves secular.
A lot of hot air
More on global warming: I'd first written about the subject here, and a brief discussion took place here. Now the Economist, in a piece entitled "Heat and Light", has more on the latest failure of the computer models that climate scientists love to boast about:
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.
One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Shoplifters beware
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The troposphere is where most of the air is found and where most of the weather occurs. Computer models predict that, if global warming is really happening, temperatures in the troposphere should rise along with those on the surface. Recorded surface temperatures are, indeed, rising. However, both data from weather balloons and observations made by satellites suggest that temperatures in the troposphere have remained constant since the 1970s. Over the tropics they may even have dropped. This counter-intuitive result has caused sceptics to question how much warming, if any, is actually going on.One of the most pernicious myths of our times is that there is a "scientific consensus" that global warming occurs. Rubbish. As James Schlesinger writes in the Wall Street Journal:
[T]he "consensus" is ostensibly based upon the several assessment reports of the IPCC. One must bear in mind that the summary reports are political documents put together by government policy makers, who, to put it mildly, treat rather cavalierly the expressed uncertainties and caveats in the underlying scientific reports. Moreover, the IPCC was created to support a specific political goal. It is directed to support the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. In turn, the convention calls for an effective international response to deal with "the common concern of all mankind"--in short, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. Statements by the leaders of the IPCC have been uninhibitedly political.Quite. So why all the alarmism, then? Well, as Swaminathan Anklesaria Aiyar had once written (and I'd linked to here):
Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment. Verification is more than computer simulations--whose conclusions mirror the assumptions built in the model. Irrespective of the repeated assertions regarding a "scientific consensus," there is neither a consensus nor is consensus science.
Because the global warming movement has now become a multi-billion dollar enterprise with thousands of jobs and millions in funding for NGOs and think-tanks, top jobs and prizes for scientists, and huge media coverage for predictions of disaster.Indeed. There is a lot of hot air around.
The vested interests in the global warming theory are now as strong, rich and politically influential as the biggest multinationals.
(WSJ link via email from Vikram.)
Praveen Patel is on the prowl with a digital camera. Heh.
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
And check out the photograph in that article, outstanding entertainment. Is that lady actually biting that gentleman?
How to scare a child out of his wits
I have the secret here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
A new kind of battery
[You're in a household in India, in the drawing room, where Mr and Mrs M Desai sit in front of the TV. She is watching her favourite soap, Astitva, while he is browsing India Uncut on his laptop. Mrs Desai suddenly gets agitated, sitting upright and pointing the remote at the TV screen and pressing buttons furiously. She is so upset, in fact, that her palloo falls down, but Mr Desai is engrossed elsewhere.]
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Making up for the public sector
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Tinku ke papa, the battery of my remote control seems to have run out.
Mr Desai: Where? I mean, yes dear, that happens.
Mrs Desai: Listen, Rinku ke bhi papa, please find me a battery from somewhere, I need to change channels.
Mr Desai: Oh dear, but why?
Mrs Desai: Oh, Chinku ke bhi papa, it's because Astitva is getting over on Zee, and I have to shift to Jassi Jaisi Koi Nahin on Sony.
Mr Desai: Hmm, pass the remote control here.
Mrs Desai: Yes, Pinku ke bhi papa. [She passes him the remote control, he takes out the battery, then he produces an unusual-looking battery from the pocket of his seductively transparent kurta. Mrs Desai blushes and lifts her palloo back up.]
Mrs Desai: What is that, Monkey ke bhi papa?
Mr Desai: It's a new kind of battery. But wait; before using it, I have to charge it first. [He gets up and starts removing the pheeta of his pyjama.]
Mrs Desai: [Alarmed] Oh, Funky ke papa, this is not the time. Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky should be back from their tuition classes any moment now.
Mr Desai: Oh, don't get alarmed dear, and adjust your palloo please. I'm just going to charge the battery. Here, read this.
[He puts his laptop on her lap, where India Uncut is shown linking to this page. She clicks on the link, and enlightenment spreads upon her face, while something else spreads somewhere else. Just then, Tinku, Rinku, Chinku, Pinku, Monkey and Funky barge in.]
(Link via email from reader Vibhu, via Slashdot.)
Subir Gokarn writes in Business Standard:
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
I’ve often been asked for my opinion on what the country’s sunrise sectors are. My response, at first tongue-in-cheek, but becoming more and more serious over the years, is that anybody who decides to compete against the government has a great chance of succeeding. Four activities come easily to mind.In the rest of his piece, Gokarn writes about how reforms have helped the private sector, which is stating the obvious, and, more interestingly, how the public sector can be reformed. He writes:
Equipment for private supply of electricity—generators, inverters, and so on—are needed to compensate for the inadequacies of the larger system. Private security makes up for the perceived failure of the state security apparatus.
Private education at every level continues to surge, while public institutions sink. And, while access to publicly-provided drinking water eludes an increasingly large proportion of the population, the number of brands and the sales volumes of bottled water continue to climb.
[L]et’s remember that market competition in the private domain has its equivalent in the form of political competition in the public sphere. And, by any indication, political competition has intensified enormously during the decade of reforms. No party, at both the central and state levels, can take its tenure in government for granted.Now, this is the part that I don’t quite understand. The “political competition” that Gokarn refers to has nothing to do with the economy; governments are not voted in or out because of how efficiently the public sector is functioning or how well the Indian economy is doing, but on the basis of narrow identity (mostly caste) politics. And it will take years, if not decades, for the electorate to shift in its priorities.
So, the absence of competitive pressure cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of the public system to match the growth and productivity performance of the private sector.
Reforming the public sector, to my mind, is a bit of a pipe dream. Reducing it makes much more sense.
Cross-posted at The Indian Economy.
Kiddo at the gym
You're in a gym. A three-year-old tot is at the benchpress machine. A 44-year-old muscular grizzled veteran of the gym goes up to him.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
Fancy a nugget?
The Telegraph reports:
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, what're you doing here? Go home and have some Complan.
Kiddo: I'm reading a book. [Pause.] Dude, uncle, can't you see, I'm doing weight training.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're too young for this stuff, leave them weights alone. Go home and drink some Bournvita.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, I can't do that, I need to work out, it's a hard, hard world out there. Only the tough survive.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, you're kidding me, right? What's tough about your life? It should be tension-free. Go home and drink some Maltova.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about my life is that I go to school soon.
Veteran: Hey, kiddo, so what's so hard about that? Go home and drink some Cadbury's Drinking Chocolate.
Kiddo: Dude, uncle, what's tough about school is... this!
Veteran: [Reading the piece] Hey, kiddo, that's really tough, I see what you mean. Finish your workout, then go home and drink a protein shake. Good on ya, kid.
The Telegraph reports:
(Link via Instapundit.)
Forget dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.I'm struck by the bit about "a density about ten million million times greater than lead." Imagine if one of those things hit you at 900,000 mph. Imagine if those things rained down on us, leaving pollen-sized holes on the earth and us. What fun.
The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.
Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.
(Link via Instapundit.)
Patch-up on a sinking ship
Narayan Rane says that Raj Thackeray, who was expected to support him during his rebellion in the Shiv Sena, has spoken out too late. "The Shiv Sena is a sinking ship and nobody can save it," said Rane. "Had he made these observations when I was expelled from the party after my 39 years association, there could have been some propriety in his utterances."
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
Learning how to fish
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Meanwhile, Manohar Joshi is reportedly trying to heal the rift between Raj and Uddhav Thackeray. What on earth is Raj's gameplan here?
This could take a long time.
Going for jingoism
The UK Film Council, which helped in funding The Rising: Ballad of Mangal Pandey, have come under attack for the historical inaccuracies that the film is allegedly littered with. The Telegraph reports:
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.
Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!
And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
An independent medium
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The £6.5 million production, which is largely in English and which opened across Britain on Friday, accuses the [British East India] company of murdering civilians to further its interests and of flouting the Empire-wide ban on slavery.There is controversy over how the mutiny began as well. The report continues:
In one scene an officer is shown bidding for a slave girl who is sent to a brothel for the exclusive use of British officers. Later, a fellow officer orders the destruction of a village and its defenceless inhabitants after they refuse to set aside land for opium production.
Saul David, the author of the acclaimed The Indian Mutiny: 1857, attacked the depictions as fabrication.
"I am no apologist for the British East India Company but I have never come across any evidence which supports either of these assertions," he said. "It is nonsense. Of course a certain amount of criticism is justified but this sounds like vilification of the British just for the sake of it."
Mr David is scathing about the film's central claim that the bloody events of 1857 were sparked by the company's insistence that Muslim and Hindu sepoys used bullet casings covered in beef and pork fat.I quite agree with the criticism. A certain amount of liberty can be taken with a historical film, but not to the extent of manufacturing so much history, and jingoistic and ludicrous scenes like that cannon sequence. The reason the film-makers do this is because of the anti-globalisation stance Bobby Bedi, the film's producer, articulates at the end of the article. He says:
The historian says many sepoys who took part in the uprising wrongly assumed that they were being asked to use casings that contravened their religious beliefs. In reality, he insists, the company withdrew the cartridges in the light of the concerns and did not issue them to a single sepoy.
The film's version of events is rather different. Not only are the bullets issued but an officer threatens to slaughter reluctant sepoys with a cannon unless they agree to use them.
We live in a world where some companies try to exert as much influence over the world as possible and the film should be seen in that context. The idea of the slave trade being used to staff brothels is conjecture on our part.Naturally such a juvenile stance can be backed only by conjecture, not facts. The film's naive political agenda was articulated by Aamir Khan as well, in a recent interview to Time Out in which he said:
The script questions the right of any superpower to move into another civilisation and control and loot it economically and socially try and change its norms. Which is also what's happening today, that's what America is doing all over the world. [...] I felt, arre, this happened in 1857 in India, it's happening today in Iraq and Afghanistan!And there, in one casual sentence, he condones the barbaric regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussain. (I also find the bit about "this happened in 1857 in India" amusing, because what he shows in the film did not, as it turns out, happen.) Afghanistan is certainly better off since the Americans got there and, far from "loot[ing] it economically", they've spent tonloads of money in that place, just as they have done in Iraq. Aamir's analogies are ludicrous and ignorant.
There are good reasons to criticise the war in Iraq, and many more reasons to condemn imperialism, as indeed it should be condemned. But the makers of this film do those causes a disservice.
Update: Other bloggers weigh in on the subject: Amardeep Singh calls the film "bombastic and over-the-top" while Arun Simha calls it "a bhel-puri that is laughable". Hmmm.
Jai Arjun Singh makes his debut on The Middle Stage with a post about "Film
", a collection of essays by Roger Manvell
published in 1944, which, unusually for books of that period, looked at cinema as "an independent medium with its own set of strengths and limitations, rather than judge it with reference to theatre or literature." Some interesting thoughts on acting in there, check it out.
The rise of Chinese soft power
No, not tender loving. Kanti Bajpai is worried that China is leaving India behind in the field of International Relations.
A rather well-fed langur
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Innovative measures are found to tackle the problem of monkeys in parliament. Love the picture.
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
(Link via email from GreatBong.)
Aah, Oliver Twists
Benignly smiling, little-boy kicking, sad-old-goat disposing, every-bone bruising, crisp-dollar-bill defecating, own-toe smacking Sonia Faleiro makes her way to [S]Cambodia. Much fun... er, for the reader, that is.
Monday, August 15, 2005
The Indian Economy: a new blog
What better day could there be than August 15 to announce a new blog on the Indian economy called [blare of trumpets, thumping of anxious heartbeats] The Indian Economy. Stationed at http://www.indianeconomy.org, this is a group blog begun by Prashant Kothari, and I'm privileged to be a part of it.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
Bollywood gets a plot
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Sharing that space with me are bloggers I've admired for a while now, and respect for their insights on both India and economics. There's Reuben Abraham, who does some outstanding blogging at the vastly under-rated Zoo Station. There's Atanu Dey, who deservedly won IndiBlogger of the Year at the last IndiBloggies. (I won a couple of minor awards, and Reuben picked up one as well.) There's my good pal, the despotic Yazad Jal of AnarCapLib. There are Amitabh Arora and Kaushik Banerjee, whom I haven't read enough of, a condition that will automatically get rectified as this blog takes off. And finally, there's Prashant himself, who blogs incisively at Inside, Outside, a blog on the Indian subcontinent and its disapora.
So, well, do check out The Indian Economy. It's just kicking off, and I hope you enjoy it as the days go by.
Update: More blog news: much to my delight, Jai Arjun Singh has agreed to join Chandrahas Choudhury and me at The Middle Stage. Chandrahas took it to new heights after he joined, and Jai, I'm sure, will make it even more of a delight to read. Much fun.
I'll be rather surprised if this doesn't become the plot for a Bollywood film soon:
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Small deeds of courage indulged in by the common folk have changed the complexion of battles all over the world. One such case of a civilian 19-year-old unsung hero, who laid down his life in the 1947 war, has come to light only now.So all they need to do is add a love interest, put in a few songs, and change the ending so that instead of dying our hero plays a part in the victory, heroically getting rid of a few dozen people despite being wounded. His love interest, who begins the film disdaining him, now falls into his bloodied arms while her daddy, who was a spy for the Kabailis, repents and blesses him before dying, declaiming haltingly but eloquently how the desh is lucky to have a sipahi as fine as our hero.
[...]
[Mohammad Maqbool] Sherwani was a gutsy boy of 19 who single-handedly thwarted the advance of thousands of raiders (Kabailis) from Baramulla, thereby giving valuable time to the Indian Army to land in Srinagar and prevent an ignominious defeat.
The nation may not remember his sacrifice, it may not even be aware of it, but the legend of Sherwani lives on in Baramulla.
His tactics to hold back the raiders were very simple, not the stuff case studies in military history are made of.
He went around on his bike telling the Kabailis, who stormed Baramulla on October 22, 1947, not to advance towards Srinagar as the Indian Army had reached the outskirts of Baramulla.
His bluff worked. [...] When the Kabailis came to know of Sherwani’s game plan, they shot him dead and crucified him.
And ah, yes, there'll also be an item number by a vamp thwarted by the hero who contributes to his cause and distracts the Kabailis by doing a rather sexy dance in rather few clothes. She dies later, of course.
Look who's talking
Indiatimes, the portal of the Times of India, has a feature today titled "58 things we want freedom from". There are some naive leftist suggestions here ("Blindly supporting capitalism", "Labour-displacing technologies", "niche malls" and "Obsession with materialism"), but what is more striking is the hypocrisy. Three of the suggestions are: "Media space provided to Page 3 types", "Yellow journalism" and "Obsessing over Aishwarya Rai’s clothes".
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
Lizardman
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The rape-condoning judge
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
It's like Osama speaking out against terrorism.
We've all heard that Stan Lee story: boy gets bitten by radioactive spider; viola: Spiderman.
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Well, what about boy eats tail of lizard in paan?
Sunday, August 14, 2005
For and against an Islamic Reformation
Salman Rushdie makes a plea for an Islamic Reformation:
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
Indian gods outsourced
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
And you know what they're made of? Irony.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
It ought to be fascinating to Muslims everywhere to see how deeply their beloved book is a product of its place and time, and in how many ways it reflects the Prophet’s own experiences.Rushdie concludes that "[t]he Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance of the concept that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities." Read the full piece.
However, few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way. The insistence within Islam that the Quranic text is the infallible, uncreated word of God renders analytical scholarly discourse all but impossible. Why would God be influenced by the socioeconomics of seventh century Arabia, after all? Why would the Messenger’s personal circumstances have anything to do with the Message?
The traditionalists’ refusal of history plays right into the hands of the literalist Islamofascists, allowing them to imprison Islam in their iron certainties and unchanging absolutes.
And for a well-articulated view that argues against the conventional wisdom of Islam needing a reformation, read Edward Feser's essay, "Does Islam Need a Luther or a Pope?" (This link via email, a few days ago, from Prakash Chandrashekar, a sometime guest-blogger at AnarCapLib.)
The Telegraph reports:
After toys and dolls, communist China — where there are strict curbs on religious practice — has flooded Indian markets with images of Hindu gods and goddesses. And the religious-minded are bowing before their superior quality.And you know what they're made of? Irony.
“Containers are landing in Mumbai by the dozens every month. Not a single idol goes unsold; there’s a mad scramble for them. I’m struggling to cope with the demand,” said Balwant Singh, who runs a gift shop in Mohali.
The most popular plastic surgery in the world
... is catching on in India. Fancy a cuppa?
Flip-flop at the White House
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
No negotiating with hijackers
After years of dithering, the government finally formulates a tough policy to deal with hijackers. About time. If they had this policy in place in 1999, Maulana Masood Azhar and Omar Sheikh would still have been behind bars.
So what's new?
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Don't you dare to dance
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Times of India reports that "nowadays men promise marriage in order to get sex."
Saturday, August 13, 2005
The moral police swings into action in Bangalore. The Indian Express reports:
A new law ‘Licensing and Controlling of Public Entertainment (Bangalore City) Order, 2005,’ originally introduced to curb the unregulated growth of dance bars/cabarets, or ‘live-band joints’ as they are known in Bangalore, has pulled the shutters on night life in the city.Well, 'provokes' and 'dancing' do make for an unusual verb-noun juxtaposition, as if 'dancing' was a synonym of 'insurgency'. Oppression provokes insurgency, music provokes dancing, and so on. The proposed ban on smoking in films, the banning of dance bars in Mumbai, the suggestion to impose dress codes on college students, and now this: there seems to be a puritan backlash rising up spontaneously in India. I wonder what 'provokes' it.
The law which came into force on June 24 is seeing owners of not just cabarets but also lounge bars, restaurants and discotheques struggling to meet stringent licensing conditions.
[...]
"You can be arrested for dancing. You also cannot play music that provokes dancing. We have had to put sofas and fill spaces to prevent customers from dancing," says Amardipta Biswas, owner of Taika and Cosmo Village, two of the city’s in-vogue lounge bars and restaurants.
"A lot of the live music in hotels in the city was real good clean fun. The politicians have now taken this to an absurd level and the controls imposed are beyond commonsense," says writer and food critic Ajit Saldanha.
"DJs have been prevented from playing music at nightspots as they incite people to dance. Night clubs have been told to play classical music, so people do not dance," says Biswas.
Oink Oink Katha
I'm a huge fan of articles that begin with the words, "Bihar's pig saga continues." Marvellous.
Return of the past
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Shekhar Gupta, a journalist for India Today during the 1984 riots, writes in the Indian Express:
[T]hose of us who covered the riots, and many more who carried out relief or citizens’ investigations subsequently, generally believe that what we saw over those murderous 72 hours were not Hindu-Sikh riots but Congress-Sikh riots. Or, rather, Delhi Congress-Sikh riots. Too many small time Congress politicians, who had built their careers organising crowds for Sanjay and then Indira Gandhi, decided revenge was naturally expected of them. So what is the difference between collecting an Emergency-type crowd to chant slogans in support of the 20-point programme, or a pogrom of the Sikhs which also brought the promise of loot.Yes, but there is a difference between haunting and punishing. The ghost may hover, but will it strike? Jagdish Tytler may be a bit spooked now, but I don't imagine Narendra Modi, the architect of a more recent genocide, is too worried about his past catching up with him. It'll be great if it happens, but I'm cynical about it.
If there is one thing that has emerged with the Nanavati Report and its aftermath, it is that political parties have to accept their past will continue to come back and haunt them.
Where were you on July 26?
If you were in Maharashtra and were affected by the cloudburst, and have an interesting story to tell, we'd like to hear it. Peter Griffin, as part of a project that we are working on, solicits first-person accounts from the tragedy here. If you'd like to contribute, send in your story to Peter at zigzackly AT gmail DOT com, putting [ThinkMumbai] in the subject line (with the square brackets), to get past the spam filters.
For more details, read here.
Friday, August 12, 2005
For more details, read here.
A worthy successor to Dharam Paaji
No, not Sunny. No, no, not Bobby either. It's Esha. IndiaFM reports:
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]
Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
The road to apathy
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.
-- Honoré de Balzac
.
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
On the premiere of her last film Dus at the E-Square multiplex in Pune, Esha [Deol] slapped a boy who tried to misbehave with her. The guy taking advantage of the crowd on the scene tried to grab Esha’s hand. And as soon as Esha grasped the situation she slapped the boy so hard that he literally fell away five feet. [Many sics.]Damn, and all these years I thought that it needed special effects or clever cuts or some trickery or the other to make it appear that you could hit a guy and send him sprawling five feet away. Whatta girl. More power to Mumbai women. And Pune women too. Hell, since I'm in a generous mood, to women everywhere. Happy now?
Society proceeds like the ocean. After a disaster, it resumes its wonted level and rhythms; its devouring interests efface all traces of damage.-- Honoré de Balzac
So shall Mumbai leave the cloudburst behind in such a way, and be apathetic again?
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Hello, check, check
The Times of India reports:
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
Aamir Khan blogs. And Deepak and Shekhar too
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
For the first time in the country’s legislative history, the Orissa assembly on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 20,000 each on three opposition MLAs for damaging the speaker’s microphones during Wednesday’s proccedings.Tsk tsk. Without the microphones, the speaker would have to shout, and then he'd be a shouter and not a speaker. That would certainly affect his throat, and soon enough he'd be a hoarse croaker, if not a raspy wheezer. Who would stand for elections to be the hoarse croaker of the legislature? Would you? See?
[...]
The house also passed a censure motion against the three. The microphones were damaged on Wednesday when the opposition members tried to storm into the speaker’s podium to disrupt assembly proceedings.
When Swaroop CH informed me that Aamir Khan had a blog, here, I didn't quite believe him, and I assumed it must be a hoax, if a cleverly done one. But he points out today that the official website for Mangal Pandey: The Rising has a link to the blog. That sort of settles the question, I guess.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
and Shekhar Kapur
have started a blog titled intentBlog, the contributors of which include some familiar names. I'm a little sceptical about subjects such as "Is the universe physical or is it more like a mind?", but hey, whatever it is, all the best to them.
It's smart of MSN, who are internet partners for the film, to use this to promote their MSN Spaces blogging service. Despite all the promotions, though, I think new bloggers will ultimately choose the blogging service that serves them the best. For my money, and I have none, that's still Blogger.
That's not the only celebrity blog around, as it happens. Kaps informs me that Deepak Chopra
Manmohan Singh's apology for 1984
In an emotional speech to the Rajya Sabha, Manmohan Singh says:
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
A conflict of interest
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
Gurgaon over Wall Street
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
I have no hesitation in apologising not only to the Sikh community but the whole nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what’s enshrined in our Constitution.Well said. But in the same speech, he adds that the Nanavati Report contains "no allegations against the top leadership of the Congress party," which runs contrary to what the media is reporting about it. Would anyone know if the Nanavati Report itself is online, so we can all read it for ourselves? Shouldn't it be?
So I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such a thing took place.
But, Sir, there are ebbs, there are tides in the affairs of the nation. The past is with us. We cannot rewrite the past. But as human beings, we have the will power and we have the ability to write a better future for all of us.
Imagine that you have been elected as a member of the state legislature from the constituency of Sangli. Who does your loyalty lie towards? Well, in theory, as a member of the legislature, you should be concerned about the entire state or country, but in practice it's your constituents, the people of Sangli who have voted you in, who really matter. Your election owes itself to the (at least implicit) promise that you will look after Sangli and its people.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Imagine next that you are made finance minister of Maharashtra. It's an honour (and some would say a revenue stream), but it's also a responsibility. As finance minister, you have a duty to the people of the state, within the parameters of your portfolio.
Imagine a cloudburst in Mumbai that causes floods through much of the city and shuts it down. It also causes lesser damage in Sangli. So what do you do? As a finance minister, your duty now is "assessing damage, distributing ex-gratia and preparing a statement of losses for Central assistance," for which you need to be in Mumbai. As the MLA for Sangli, your duty is to rush to your constituency.
Jayant Patil rushed to Sangli. Read the full Indian Express report here. I've also posted on it here.
Now, I'm not going to pass judgement here. Perhaps his officials at the ministry were perfectly equipped to do the job, and the need for his presence was greater in Sangli. Or maybe he was lax in his duties. Whatever be the case, the conflict of interest he faced would not have arisen if our political system was more like the USA's, where Condi Rice and Donald Rumsfeld do not represent constituencies. (They might feel some loyalty towards interest groups etc, you could say, but they do not have a constitutional duty towards them.) And there would have been lesser scope for it if Mumbai was a separate state. That, certainly, is a point in favour of that idea.
Thursday, August 11, 2005
MBA students in American schools are looking at India for internship opportunities.
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
(Link via email from Vikrum Sequeira.)
Condi's DNA
Ian, Salman, Julian, Kazuo, Zadie...
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
... and 12 others make the Booker Prize longlist. It's a heck of a list, and a strong, strong year for the novel.
Throwing darts at black money
Gautam Chikermane points out a problem and offers a solution in the Indian Express:
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
If only.
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Up there, right at the top, one of the objectives of our finance minister is to get unaccounted black money into the mainstream and plug tax leakages. With the number of property transactions rising like the Sensex, I wonder how he and his department are unable to see that apartments selling for Rs 50 lakh are being shown as being sold for Rs 15 lakh — an extreme, but real-life situation — how a system where 40-50 per cent of the transacted value is unaccounted for continues to thrive. Right in the capital. The income tax department is looking to collect hundreds and thousands when there are lakhs and crores circulating unabatedly, unabashedly, unchecked.If only.
Here’s a scheme — far simpler than Chidambaram’s 1997 VDIS (Voluntary Disclosure Income Scheme) — to unearth this income. Take the real estate classified “for sale” pages of leading newspapers and put them up on a board. Get five children to throw darts on that paper. Put a team of three IT sleuths and get them to pretend they are buyers of those properties. When the person asks for cash, pay cash. Catch them red-handed and then let the law take its course. Do this in four metros and all state capitals regularly, diligently, sincerely.
Publicise the effort and the outcomes (people caught).
A gastronomic offensive
Government attacks Maoists with Pepsi and Pizza.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Applied mathemeticians examine dating
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Such fun. Between pepperoni and armed insurgence, I'd take pepperoni anyday.
Nice and cuddly multinational
For all those who simplistically think of multinational corporations as evil, here's one example to the contrary, pointed out by Arun Simha.
India Uncut Nugget 13
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...
From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
, one of the stories in the collection "The Wisdom of Father Brown
". Also collected in the superb "The Best of Father Brown
".
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
I know it is the practice of journalists to put the end of the story at the beginning and call it a headline. I know that journalism largely consists of saying "Lord Jones Dead" to people who never knew that Lord Jones was alive. Your present correspondent thinks that this, like many other journalistic customs, is bad journalism...From "The Purple Wig" by GK Chesterton
More Nuggets and Aphorisms here.
The petty behemoth
Reader Sivanath is livid at this headline that he sees on the Times of India website:
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Dhansak, Patra Ni Macchi, Farcha, Bheja, Kaleji etc
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Send hate mail to Dravid and Chappell.
Heh. This is not some bulletin board started by a hot-headed 13-year-old, you will note, but a service offered by the publishers of the largest-selling English-language newspaper in the world. What a shame.
Update: Karthik and Sibin separately point out via email that ToI do this kind of thing regularly. Here's an example: Send hate mail to Sourav Ganguly.
Arzan Sam Wadia gets nostalgic for Parsi food.
The Left is right, for once
The Left demands action against Jagdish Tytler. The Congress "squirms".
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
A chance to explore the world
VS Naipaul says:
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham Greene
did. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
This is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conrad
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Blogging about the tsunami
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Update: Good news: Tytler has resigned from the union cabinet. But is this all there will be?
VS Naipaul says:
("Actually, I think 'A Bend in the River
' is much, much better than Conrad"), and India ("there are no thinkers in India").
What I felt was, if you spend your life just writing fiction, you are going to falsify your material. And the fictional form was going to force you to do things with the material, to dramatize it in a certain way. I thought nonfiction gave one a chance to explore the world, the other world, the world that one didn't know fully. I thought if I didn't have this resource of nonfiction I would have dried up perhaps. I'd have come to the end of my material, and would have done what a writer like Graham GreeneThis is from "The Irascible Prophet: V. S. Naipaul at Home", a feature by Rachel Donadio in the New York Times. It's a good read, and contains some provocative views on terrorism, Islam, Joseph Conraddid. You know, he took the Graham Greene figure to the Congo, took him to Argentina, took him to Haiti, for no rhyme or reason.
If you write a novel alone you sit and you weave a little narrative. And it's O.K., but it's of no account. If you're a romantic writer, you write novels about men and women falling in love, etc., give a little narrative here and there. But again, it's of no account.
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
Jai Arjun Singh writes on the role blogs played during the tsunami, with a kind mention of my own efforts. Thanks Jai.
The George Orwell book?
The Left seems to have forgotten all about 1984.
Attacking the media
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.
Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
So what's the difference between Indian and Pakistan if this can happen? Mid Day criticises Vilasrao Deshmukh, the Congress chief minister of Maharashtra, for his government's incompetence. Deshmukh sends his gundas to the Mid Day office. They break in and vandalise the place. Mid Day's report says:
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
While 10-15 people came to the editorial office on the first floor, the rest which numbered about 50 shouted slogans on the ground floor.And here's the bit I find most remarkable:
The group that came to the first floor roughed up the watchman, broke open the door and charged in shouting on the top of their voices.
This group broke computer keyboards, yanked out phone wires and one of them had even held up a chair to throw at the publisher’s glass cabin.
Ironically, other press had also arrived at the Mid Day office with the Congress persons, giving the indication that the ruling party had called the media in advance to flaunt their cowardly act.Not only do these thugs break the law, they have the audacity to flaunt it to the world. What a shame.
Mid Day documents other such incidents against the media here. Also, here are some reactions from Congress leaders.
License to rape
The Indian Express reports:
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
The ghosts in the publishing machine
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
After the evidence
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Parmaram Sharan (27) was convicted of rape and kidnapping on Monday and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. But Sharan—he was also told by the Sessions court to pay Rs 50,000 to the victim as compensation—will not be going to jail.I'm shaking my head in disbelief here. The law is supposed to apply equally to everyone, regardless of class, caste, gender or whether you're the sole earning member of your family and have 813 dependents. You couldn't be sending out a worse message.
“The court has given Sharan a probation of three years on personal bond of Rs 10,000 on the ground that he is the sole earning member of his family and he has dependents—two young children and ailing parents,” said public prosecutor Lata Cheda.
I wonder if the chaps who abducted and sold this woman, and the fellow who bought and raped her, had any dependents.
Editors. And they're dying out in Britain, writes Blake Morrison in the Observer.
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Also, here's Jason Cowley on why this is "perhaps the richest year for contemporary British and Commonwealth fiction since the launch of the Booker Prize in 1969."
Monday, August 08, 2005
The Nanavati Report on the 1984 riots has been tabled, and finds "credible evidence" that Jagdish Tytler had a hand in them. It also finds "credible material" against two other Congress leaders, Sajjan Kumar and Balwan Khokhar.
What now?
What now?
3 am
The Times of India reports on an institute that has been set up to train people -- only women, in fact -- to be good wives. It reports:
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."
Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
(Link via Uma.)
Brief impressions from a journey
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.
Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Classes are held between seven and ten every morning, chiefly during the marriage months. A batch has an average of twenty girls who diligently note down lessons that include how to brush the teeth in the in-law's house, how to cook and how to eat. The girls also learn that they have to control their sex drive because in a joint family situation where there is not enough space, the girls should know that they cannot have their men all the time. The course even educates them on how to sleep in the in-laws house. "You just can't wear any clothes in your in-law's house. And you can't lie in any way you want," Hemnani says. "Your husband's home is not your father's house. Good manners are a must."Yes, I like the bit about not wearing any clothes in the "in-law's house." The institute also has time-tables for the day, specifying "midnight to three in the morning" as the best time to have sex, and "three to six in the morning" as the "time to sing bhajans". I can imagine this scene:
[Husband and wife lying on a mat besides a massive four-foot clock, where the time is 2.59 am.]Well, it's the institute that left that loophole, not me.
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Ooh! Aah! Aaa-oooh! Mmm! Eeeeh! Ohhhh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooh! Ah! Mmmmmm! Faaaa-haaaster! Oh! Aaaaaah!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Oooooooooooh!
[Suddenly, the alarm clock rings, loudly enough to wake up Mumbai. The wife's delicate sweaty hand crawls up and smashed the button on top of it. It stops.]
Wife: We must stop now, it's 3 am, time to sing bhajans, according to my institute.
Husband: Uh? But you can also fu... I mean, please your husband until 3 am, is it not? I'm sure 3 am is inclusive.
Wife: But I also have to sing bhajans.
Husband: I'm sure you can manage both.
Wife: Um, ok, let's try.
Husband: Ok. Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: [Sings] Vaishnav jana to, oooh!
Husband: Uh, uh, uh, uh!
Wife: Tene, aaah, kahiye je...
Husband: Uh, ah, oh!
(Link via Uma.)
Chandrahas, who is on his way from Mumbai to Delhi, sends this SMS (reproduced with his permission):
Train rattling along at 70 an hour; green fields and ugly slushy towns; rain once an hour or so; a high wind whistling through the coach; many brown rivers in spate; a fat egg paratha made by mother waiting for lunch -- wish you guys were here to enjoy all this.Well, we're enjoying it now, aren't we?
The heroism of ordinary people
Just how remarkable was the way Mumbai's citizens rushed to each other's aid after the cloudburst? For crisis situations, it was perhaps par for the course. Baruch Fischhoff writes in the New York Times, in the context of similar "social coordination" after the Air France crash of last week:
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Fat. Dumb. Lazy
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
First there was Y2K
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
While this sort of behavior is often described as remarkable, it is actually what researchers have come to expect. Studies of civilians' intense experiences in the London Blitz; the cities of Japan and Germany in World War II; the 1947 smallpox outbreak in New York; the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and even fires have found that people, however stressed, almost always keep their wits and elevate their humanity.In other words, helping others in a crisis is hardwired in us. Comforting.
Indeed, the critical first responders in almost any crisis are ordinary citizens whom fate has brought together. As Kathleen Tierney, head of the University of Colorado's Natural Hazards Center, has noted, "The vast majority of live rescues are carried out by community residents who are at the scene of disasters, not by official response agencies or outside search and rescue teams."
(Link via email from Ravikiran, via Instapundit.)
Cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
Michael Higgins explains what happens to firms or institutions that do not face competition. Like the government.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
Now there's daylight saving.
Feeling grumpy? Must be PPS
Jocelyn Hale writes in the Star Tribune:
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"
10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit
,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Tulsi, dead or alive?
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Upon finishing J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,"Heh. Love the guy's name. Bookjoy! And here's a statement of my life's purpose: to cause PLM, even APLT, in as many people as possible. If only intent matches outcome.10-year-old Ben C. listlessly moped around his house for three days. He picked at his food and was short-tempered with his sister. His alarmed mother took his temperature, inquired about problems with friends and probed into the nature of his malady. All Ben could say was that he was feeling a "deep sense of loss." Across town, Francis M. drifted through two days in a daze, taking little interest in her usual activities.
Doctors at St. Mungos Hospital are asserting that Ben and Francis are two of the earliest cases of "Post Potter Syndrome." All indications are that PPS will become a full-blown epidemic by late August. [...]
Dr. Glenn M. Bookjoy, a researcher of the history of literary maladies, said that the symptoms of PPS are severe but they typically only last for three to seven days. "Although PPS is a modern disease, it falls under the broad category of Acute Post Literary Trauma (APLT) or the less severe Post Literary Malaise (PLM). Historically, children have suffered similar effects after reading classics such as J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit,' and 'The Lord of the Rings
' trilogy; C.S. Lewis' 'The Chronicles of Narnia
'; and the 'Little House
' series by Laura Ingalls Wilder," commented Dr. Bookjoy.
(Link via email from the avuncular Peter Griffin.)
Manoj, who blogs at Minor Scale, nearly chokes on the crouton in his salad when he reads the Times of India claiming that Tulsi is going to die. He is "defibrillated ... back to consciousness" by a Rediff report that Tulsi is not going to die. Naturally, he is upset at the deception by ToI, "on behalf of millions of housewives all over India," or "desi aunties", as he puts it.
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
On a tangent, the Google search term that leads the highest number of visitors to India Uncut is "Indian aunties". Sigh. Why guys, why? What's wrong with the nieces?
Very little motion
Richard D Webb, an Irish gentleman, once wrote of somebody:
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.
Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
The rise of the Muslim League
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.
How did this come to pass?
Read the rest here.
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
[He spends] the greater part of the day writing in his room. I suppose he thinks he is shaking the world, but I can perceive very little of the motion so far.Sounds just like a blogger, doesn't he, this fellow whom Webb is speaking of? Well, the gentleman in question, who Webb met in Dublin in 1844, is Henry Clarke Wright, an "antebellum American reformer whose eclectic interests ranged from antislavery to radical pacifism to health reform and beyond." He was born in 1797, two centuries before blogging and yet, in every way, quite a blogger himself. Check out this superb article by W Caleb McDaniel, "Blogging in the Early Republic".
(Link via email from Rohit Gupta.)
... was the fault of the Congress. Mukul Kesavan writes in the Telegraph:
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
In the decade before de-colonization, it was the first five years, from the provincial elections of 1937 to the Quit India movement of 1942, that saw the creation and consolidation of a separatist Muslim politics at an all-India level. At the end of these five years, the Congress could no longer seek political consolation in the thought that if the Congress didn’t represent the Muslims no Muslim party could plausibly claim to represent them either. A re-invented, populist All-India Muslim League, ruthlessly stewarded by Jinnah, stood centre-stage in Indian politics, its claim to represent India’s Muslims increasingly seconded by the raj.Read the rest here.
How did this come to pass?
This is part of an ongoing series of historical essays by Kesavan, an essayist I enjoy reading more than any other Indian. His previous essay, that I'd linked to here, spoke about how the Congress monopolized the Indian political space in the 1920s and early 1930s. Before complacence set in.
The singing of trees
Primary Red of Secular-Right India writes:
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Beautifully put.
Chasing beef
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
There is much majesty in all our lands & people, obscured by all our modernity. This is why many personal & intellectual revolutions happen during journeys without destinations.Beautifully put.
Given this, how is it that so few of us travel through India, abandoning the trappings of our status in life, catching up on what India really is? How is it that few expressions in our cinema and literature are of these journeys of real people?
Why is India's matinee icon an angry young man, not an adventurous young idealist?
Why do our actors sing around trees rather than standing still for the singing of trees?
Remember this: the Delhi Municipal Corporation offering Rs 2000 per cow? Well, the Telegraph reports that as soon as the news was out, residents of Delhi gave up eve-teasing for cow-chasing, and the city was full of people chasing cows. But it wasn't quite that simple. The report says:
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
[T]he great capital cattle rush lasted only a single day and traffic to the pound was down to a trickle this morning.Aha. Bureaucracy. Don't turn in those cows, boys, they're far, far better creatures that the jerks who feed their families with your taxes, and take your cow away from you. Yes, that's your cow now, finders keepers. Take it home, give it a name, give it a bath if you so desire, and give it some grass.
The reason: the city fathers would not hand the catchers the cash they wanted but only a receipt.
“Show me the money,” cried Khalid, a B.Sc student at Aurobindo College, who had caught a cow at Malviya Nagar on Friday. He had torn his trousers and lost his slippers in the effort. He now wanted hard cash, not a scrap of paper with something scribbled on it.
“It was two hours of hard work. I chased it so hard. It even stamped on my foot and tore my slippers. I have bruises all over,” Khalid was inconsolable. “Yet all I got was a receipt. There was no money.”
[...]
Civic officials said an advertisement will be published soon explaining that cattle-catchers must prove they are residents of the area where they found the cow. They must produce a voter identity card or a similar document and a note from the local resident welfare association.
No, Salil, not the kind you roll in a joint.
And no, please don't try this. (This link via email from Rahul.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Don't slap me, it's legal
Weekly World News reports:
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
Murli Manohar Joshi roars with laughter...
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Adding to its reputation as the most sexually liberal nation in the world, Sweden has just legalized looking up ladies' skirts!According to the report, both the women standing and the men looking enjoyed the experience. All rather bizarre, I say. I mean, it isn't the act but the context, surely, that matters. If you are looking up the skirt of someone with her (or his!) agreement, then it is surely fine. And if that person doesn't want you to look up her (or his?) skirt, then it surely isn't fine.
In a nearly unanimous vote in the Swedish Parliament, the motion was carried 332 to 17. To celebrate the new law, the Parliament's second floor was replaced with a see-through glass floor, and women were invited to stand on the floor, wearing their loosest, widest skirts, with or without underwear. Men were invited to bring their cameras, stand on the floor below and look up.
What am I doing? That piece of news must surely be a spoof. Woe me.
(Link via email from Gamesmaster G9, via Deep Pal.)
... when he reads this.
Busy with recordings
Buried in this collection of snippets about parliament proceedings is the news that Lata Mangeshkar, who is often criticised for not attending the Rajya Sabha, has "sought leave" because she is "busy with recordings." The report states, "Till now, she had attended the House only for a few days."
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
Almost Page 3
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.
Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.
And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.
Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Oh, our poor legislators
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
What a lady. But it could be worse, you know. Imagine if Somnath Chatterjee went off to cut an album.
So what if my picture has never come on the Page 3 of any newspaper. I have, at least, managed to get my photo on the same page as Shobha De's. This one.
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Weep weep. It's not all ignominy, though. Uma Mahadevan-Dasgupta's snap is right above mine, and that can only be a good thing. For the record, we were asked to comment on the new newspapers in Mumbai. Here's what Uma had to say. As for me, I was specifically asked (by youthful Sonia): "[D]oes greater quanitity equal better reportage?" My take on it:
I'm not sure if more newspapers are resulting in better journalism in Mumbai. For one thing, the pool of journalists all the newspapers have to choose from has remained more or less the same, even if better paid. So the talent is simply more thinly spread. Secondly, one would have expected newspapers to try and improve their quality of journalism in areas such as hard reporting, but instead other papers are trying to outdo the Times of India in their celebrity and glam coverage, assuming, perhaps correctly, that those are the things that keep readers happy. Journalism in India needs a change in values, and that will not happen with more local newspapers, but with the full and unhindered entry of foreign media, which will raise the benchmarks here. Until then, it's all just more of the same.Yes, I'm against protectionism.
Shobha De, of course, wrote the main story on the subject. What did she have to say? Well, I present you her first two lines:
Let me stick my neck out and say it -- Bunty and Babli Rule. Readers and viewers have never had it so good.And her last two lines:
The Bollywoodisation of the media is finally complete. Let the dhadak dhadak begin.Sigh. Ok, let it begin. We bloggers will just go off into the mountains.
Saturday, August 06, 2005
Rajeev Shukla plays the sympathy card. Heh.
Public interest triumphs over Abdul Kalam
I had been appalled at APJ Abdul Kalam's attempts to keep himself out of the scope of the Right to Information Act, as had others. Well, the UPA government has now sensibly shot down his suggestions. It has stated, correctly, that "the claim of immunity and privilege has to be based on public interest."
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
A vortex in the Met Department
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
Another excerpt from the article:
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]
All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Mr Kalam gets his salary from taxpayers' money, and it is a pity that people in prominent political positions forget to whom their loyalties should lie. We have the right to know what is being done with our money, and Mr Kalam's attempt to curtail that right was disgraceful, coming from someone who is nominally our head of state. Thankfully, he has been shown his place.
This was cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai.
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
A few days back S R Kalsi, the additional director general of meteorology, had forecast in an interview that we took rather seriously that there would be heavy rains "any time on or after August 5". Well, yesterday was August 5, and the weather's been a tease since then, often overcast, hardly drizzling. Could it be -- shock, horror -- that Mr Kalsi did not know what he was talking about? The Telegraph reports:
The meteorology experts, who had failed to predict last week’s deluge in Mumbai, today said they haven’t yet found out why it happened.Another excerpt from the article:
Still, at a post-mortem of the record 944 mm rain that traumatised the city on July 26, weather scientists tried to come up with a theory before science and technology minister Kapil Sibal. They said they suspect a meteorological condition called a “vortex” caused the freak rain.
They admitted they had no evidence for this.
[Akhilesh] Gupta [a scientist] said the UK weather office did manage to predict 800 mm rain over Mumbai when it ran a computer model; but it could do this only after the event, using weather parameters after the downpour. “It could not predict the Mumbai rain in real time,” Gupta said. [My emphasis.]All of this underscores how little we understand the weather, and how ludicrously inexact all these complex weather forecasting models are. And it amuses me that when we can barely predict the weather a week from now, we have environmentalists pontificating on weather changes that global warming will cause a century from now. How can one not be sceptical?
Google is hiring
They need culinary engineers. Interested?
Madness for a price
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Some startling investigative journalism from Mumbai Mirror:
Money can even buy madness. For Rs 5,000 only, you can put away anyone you dislike/hate/just-want-to-get-rid-of in the Thane Mental Asylum. No doctor's certificate needed, no court order, no identification procedure, why, not even proof of your address.Madness certificates, arrest warrants, babies, you can buy anything these days. What's your poison?
We are not being crazy. Mumbai Mirror correspondents Bhupen Patel, Rimona Ellis and Naveeta D Singh checked out the Asylum's corrupt ways themselves. Bhupen, posing as Deepak Sonawane, succeeded with the help of his "sister" Naveeta in getting papers for his "mentally unstable wife" Rimona's admission cleared by the Asylum superintendent Dr A R Nakalgaonkar by shelling out Rs 5,000.
Of course the correspondents had to go through a 'network' of contacts, starting from the asylum's peon, to get to Dr Nakalgaonkar, and initially the superintendent did make some queries. But all of them were quick and cursory, and once Sonawane told him he was going through hell because of his wife's illness and was willing to do anything to get his wife admitted, the superintendent softened up and politely told him that the admission would "cost Rs 5,000."
The great safety valve
The speech by Justice Markandey Katju that Fali Nariman referred to here (and I'd posted about here) has been excerpted by the Hindu. TA Abinandanan, who sends me the link, points out: "It is not the best of speeches, but the excerpts have just the right parts."
Newsworthy or paid for?
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
An age of appearances
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. Buss
, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Read the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
No annual fee on ICICI credit cards.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
We'd expect this from the Times of India, which we know sells editorial space. But Rediff? I'm disappointed.
Friday, August 05, 2005
Daniel Akst writes in the Wilson Quarterly:
The importance of good looks rose “dramatically” for both men and women from 1939 to 1989, the period of the study, according to David M. BussRead the full piece, "Looks Do Matter", here. Not good news for ones such as me. Shouldn't blogs matter as well?, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of Texas. On a scale of 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man’s looks even more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier. Since the 1930s, Buss writes, “physical appearance has gone up in importance for men and women about equally, corresponding with the rise in television, fashion magazines, advertising, and other media depictions of attractive models.”
In all likelihood this trend will continue, driven by social and technological changes that are unlikely to be reversed anytime soon—changes such as the new ubiquity of media images, the growing financial independence of women, and the worldwide weakening of the institution of marriage. For better or worse, we live now in an age of appearances. It looks like looks are here to stay.
Active, interesting, fibreglass
Vimalanand Prabhu writes in:
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contaminated water
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
If you have ever been to [the] IIT Powai campus, one things you may notice is that there are many stray cows. These cows are not domesticated, but "junglee" (wild). There are enough shrubs for them to feed on their own. These cows are not fat but quite skinny, probably because they are quite active.Meanwhile, the kind Neha Viswanathan sends me links to some interesting cow pictures, as well as this beautiful one. Such green!
Rumor has it that when the owner of the Powai land handed it over to the IIT, he requested that cows never be moved from the campus.
And Gaurav is amused by a cow which is a sitting duck. Don't joke about cows, Gaurav.
These are just three of the 14 people who have emailed me in the last 12 hours with links to cow-related stuff. Most of the rest went to Google News, typed in "cow", and sent me a result or four. Enough now. Too much of a good thing and all that.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Mid Day reports (I am reproducing the article in full because it's important):
A test conducted on 84 water samples from different parts of the city on July 29 at the BMC laboratory at Dadar (W) revealed that 58 samples in the lot was unfit for human consumption. [Sic.] Some samples were found to be contaminated by dangerous Ecoli bacteria.Well, here's a question for the readers: would you know what one can do (besides buying mineral water, which not all of us can afford) to make sure that the water we drink is safe? Will boiling it suffice? Will filtering it through Aquaguard be sufficient? What about Zero B?
Said hydraulic engineer T V Shah, “Underground water tanks get contaminated during the rains when dirty water enters the tanks during flooding. The tanks should be chlorinated thoroughly.”
Adds a source within the BMC, “At some places sewage water was found to have leaked into drinking water tanks, making the water absolutely unfit for drinking.”
If you have an answer to that, please leave it in the comments of this post. Any links you could provide would be useful as well.
Digging up the dead
This is cross-posted on Cloudburst Mumbai, where comments are open.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
Contempt of the people
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.
Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Times of India reports:
The rains may have broken lives, limbs and and homes but they’ve made not the slightest dent in the great bureaucratic machine.So after the one-time disaster of the cloudburst, we have the perennial disaster of the Indian bureaucracy to deal with. And these men, the ones who ask for dead babies to be dug up, get their salaries from the taxes that we pay. What a shame that after 50 years of this nonsense, we still haven't been able to ensure that our money is spent wisely.
The Thane tehsildar’s office is demanding that the Sheikhs, a poor couple from Mumbra who lost their two-moth-old baby to the deluge, should exhume the body and conduct a post-mortem in order to claim the Rs 50,000 compensation.
This despite a receipt from the kabrastaan affirming the burial and any number of witnesses who watched the shivering, drenched baby die.
I've always found India's laws regarding contempt of court to be rather bizarre, as they restrain free speech in not allowing people to criticize court judgements, or even to point out, with evidence, that a judge may have taken a bribe. Well, an eminent judge has finally spoken up for the people, and Fali Nariman applauds it in the Indian Express. He writes:
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
The speech delivered by Justice Markandey Katju, chief justice of the High Court of Madras, on the first anniversary of the inauguration of the Madurai Bench (July 24) was like a breath of fresh air. He said that it was a fundamental principle in democracy that the people are supreme, and that all authorities — judges, legislators, ministers, bureaucrats, and so on — were servants of the people, and should be proud to be servants of the people. He did not stop there. Since the people are our masters, he went on, and we are their servants, surely the masters have a right to criticise us and take us to task if we do not function properly; so we should not take offence when the people criticise us; our authority rests on public confidence, and not on the power of contempt.Read the full piece, in which Nariman examines the origins of "the branch of law known as 'scandalising the court'".
Also, Nariman speaks out here for reforming the lower judiciary.
Studied calculus, got asked Pulakesin
Heh. I'm just glad I'm no longer in school.
When it pours
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
A shorter version of this piece was published in today's edition of the Asian Wall Street Journal (August 5-7, P11). I can't find a link online, and it's a subscription site anyway, so here you go.
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
One moment you are connected to the world in a global hub of the worldwide village; the next, the lights go off, the phone networks cease to function, and the water rises outside, creeping up on cars and first-floor apartments like an insidious idea. What does it take to shut down South Asia’s financial capital, Bombay? A few hours of rain, that’s all.
On July 26, Bombay received 944 millimeters of rainfall, the highest ever-recorded in India, and more than the average for a season in the city. (London gets less in a year.) The city ceased to function. Power and telecommunications went dead in parts of the city, the airport shut down and trains stopped running. Traffic came to a halt, as if the vehicles on the street were stuck to it. The water rose as high as 15 feet in some suburbs, and the highways looked like rivers from where the poor wet crow flies. People across the city were rendered immobile and incommunicado, as a modern city was shut down by an ancient element: water.
Water is to Bombay what Kryptonite is to Superman. Normally this is a city where nothing stops. It swirls with movement, seemingly chaotic but always purposeful, and even in the late hours of the night, when the rest of Indian sleeps, Bombay buzzes with activity, connected to the rest of the world, bearing the fortunes of India. Unless it rains heavily.
Every year Bombay is badly hit on at least a couple of days during the monsoons, as the city shuts down because of too much rain. Weather forecasts rarely give enough notice, and a more accurate warning is the crying of street dogs. As rain lashes down and the water level rises, they keep moving along the streets in search of higher ground. When there is none to be found, and they cannot escape the water, they start crying. They do not do this in packs, mostly, and it is not as conspicuous as wolves wailing at the wind. So it is often lost amid the many other noises of a busy city.
Then, across the city, as if souls are leaving bodies at the scene of a mass suicide, drivers abandon their cars. The water is often knee-deep by now, and traffic has stopped moving. Trains stop plying, buses empty out, and commuters across the city begin wading through water to get home.
It is no picnic. The water is dark-brown and muddy, straight from the sewer. It is effectively Bombay's drainage system come overground. Bits of garbage float on the water, as do plastic bags of all colors: red, green, yellow, pink. Even India's debris is colorful. And the water swirls sometimes, enough to whip the sandals of your feet so that you are forced to walk barefoot. You could roll your pants up, but the water can reach your armpits, and there's only so far that a trouser can go.
Many people remain where they are. In their schools or offices, where they might spend a hungry night, with restaurants either partly submerged or unable, for obvious reasons, to deliver. Expecting mothers who need to deliver are unable to reach nursing homes, or if they are already there, their husbands cannot make it. Some commuters stay in their cars, hungry and, as the water rises around them, thirsty. (This year some people died like this as their autolock systems prevented them from leaving their cars, and they suffocated in their underwater vehicles.) Waiting can be dangerous, and that is what drives so many to walk.
A walk home could mean 30 kilometers of trudging through the dirtiest obstacle course on the planet. Some of my friends once walked from the southern edge of the city to a northern suburb, a trek that took them more than eight hours. At one place, the water was chest high, and one of them needed to relieve himself. He did not bother to unzip. "What would have been the point of that?" he asked me later.
The conditions can be brutal, but the people are not. Bombay is a city known for its relentless pace, but if you slow down to take it in, you find that people can be very kind to you. Like the autorickshaw-driver who dropped a schoolgirl home after she spent 11 hours in his vehicle, and refused to take money for his efforts. Like the people everywhere who allow you to use their mobile phones to call home, or to take a sip of their water, even though it is now an incredibly precious commodity in this time of its excess. Like the men who pulled me out of a manhole that almost sucked me in when I was wading through thigh-deep water. Indeed, like all the people who stand around manholes in waist-deep water so that no one steps into them accidentally, and the families that cook food all day and then wade out to distribute it.
A combination of factors combined to make this year worse than most other years. To begin with, it rained much more: so much more that buildings across the street looked like ghostly images, and one could not be certain if they really were there. Secondly, the sea was at high tide. When that is so, it rushes into those parts of the drainage system that have an outlet into the sea, and the rainwater doesn't seep away fast enough. And the water down below mixes with the water on top.
But partly to blame was Bombay itself. The garbage disposal systems of the city are inadequate. Construction is growing in the northern suburbs of the city faster than the infrastructure can keep up. Environmentalists claimed that the reclamation of parts of the Mithi river, near some of the worst-affected suburbs, caused it to overflow when the cloudburst took place. And, most importantly, there was clearly no disaster management plan in place for such a situation.
The result was that more than 150,000 people were trapped in the railway stations alone, as the metallic monsters that bear six million people every day lay inertly on the water like dead, floating earthworms. Slums and shanty townships were also badly affected, with some houses simply being washed away – addresses wiped out – and others being submerged. There was a landslide in parts of Mumbai, and many people died in a stampede caused by rumors of a tsunami.
Television channels showed pictures of the city from above, cityscapes turning into seascapes, with rescue workers on inflatable boats picking up lone swimmers. They ran scrolls at the bottom of the screen with messages like "Ramesh Shah, call home soon, parents worried," as if Ramesh Shah was anywhere near a television set or a phone that worked.
The rain ceased, temporarily, after a day, but began again last weekend. Some suburbs remained flooded in the interim, and did not get power and water supply for a week. Where the water receded, the streets piled up with massive amounts of rotting garbage, onto which crows descended and stray dogs lingered. I came across the carcass of a buffalo lying in the middle of the road, which for some mysterious reason was wearing a helmet. As many as 1,500 dead cattle punctuated the streets of Bombay, and the city government refused to clear them up, saying that it was the owners’ responsibility.
It would all take time to clear up, but eventually the city would function again, and everyone would feel proud of living in such an important city. And the dogs, those that were left and were now dry, would stop crying. Until next year
Giving up cricket...
... and taking up Jihad. David Brooks profiles the modern terrorist.
A profit of Rs 1950 (per cow)
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?
"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
The Toilet Test
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The Bhopal Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 50 for every stray cow you hand over to it.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
The Delhi Municipal Corporation is offering Rs 2000.
So if you're an employee in the cow department (I presume there must be one) of the Bhopal Municipal Corporation, the smart thing to do would be to hire a couple of cheap trucks, load the cows you get and take them over to Delhi. No?
(First link mentioned earlier here, and the second link was sent to me by five readers, separately. I tell you.)
In more cow mail, reader Veena emails me this gruesome tail, I mean, tale:
A friend of mine at work went skydiving yesterday somewhere in central Illinois which is famous for cornfields, more cornfields and cows. When my friend was up there hanging upside down enjoying the view, he apparently saw this jersey cow down below peacefully grazing in one of the cornfields. Our man, a cow hater, anticipating such a situation had stratregically left the zipper of one of his trouser pockets open. So as he was flying over this unfortunate cow, his rental car keys (would have weighed 5 lbs) fell out of his pocket and after executing a perfect aerodynamic free fall, hit the cow killing it instantly. Our victorious man then spent a good 14 hours in 95 degree heat gloating over the murder until the locksmith arrived to open his rental car. What do you think is the ideal punishment for such men?"Men," you call such cow-killers? Snort! I do have an apt punishment, though. Make them watch "Yahaan".
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
Thursday, August 04, 2005
Ayanjit Sen of the BBC reports:
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Village council candidates in India should be allowed to stand for election only if they have a toilet at home, the rural development minister says.Yeah, well, I can imagine the following scene:
In a letter to all chief ministers, Raghuvansh Prasad Singh said the toilet rule should be set out in law.
He said too many elected members "do not have toilet facilities in their own houses and defecate in the open".
[Sound of vigorous knocking in Lota Singh Kabootar's house. Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh is standing outside.]Aren't you glad that I don't have a webcam to record the things I imagine?
Lota: Yes. What do you want?
Raghuvansh: I have seen your name on the electoral rolls. I am the mural demolishment, I mean, rural development minister. I want to inspect if you have a toilet at home.
Lota: Of course I have a toilet at home, minister saab. Come and have a look.
[The two walk inside to a small extension of the house, where Lota Singh Kabootar opens the door, and switches on a light. I there is a sparkling white commode. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh walks up to it and inspects it..]
Raghuvansh: Hmmm. This is indeed a spiny commune, I mean, a shiny commode. It looks brand new to me. [He takes out a vial and squeezes out some drops into the commode.]
Lota: What are you doing, minister saab?
Raghuvansh: [Peering inside.] Just as I thought. Your commode has failed the litmus test. It has never, ever been used. No Xmas tree, I mean, no excrement has ever ventured inside. You don't use this commode.
Lota: [Worried now] No, no, minister saab, we use it all the time. We even did a puja with it. Om namah shivaya. Ho ho. Ha ha.
[Raghuvansh Prasad Singh sniffs in the air, and walks purposefully out of the toilet, through the kitchen, and out the back door. Lota Singh Kabootar follows him. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh goes and peers behind a tree. He does not like what he sees.]
Raghuvansh: Ah, so there is where you screw your dumpling, I mean, do your dumping!
Lota: Sir, minister saab, the regulation only said that we had to have a toilet in the house. It did not mention anywhere that I had to use it.
Raghuvansh: Hmm. Well, I feel like winking at your daughter, I mean, drinking your water. Go and get some water for me.
Lota: Yes, minister saab. Instantly.
[Lota Singh Kabootar goes off to get some water. Raghuvansh Prasad Singh looks all around, and on finding that the coal is near, I mean, the coast is clear, lifts up his dhoti. And ...]
(BBC link via email from Sanjeev aka Desi Poet.)
Irritable as if suffering from indigestion
Oh woe. I never thought I'd see the day that a friend of mine, no less, would use a word like "atrabilious" in a post. Jai, Jai, what to do with you?
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
The dying of the flame
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Or maybe I'm just tetchy ("an incorrigibly fractious young man").
Chandrahas Choudhury comes up with yet another wonderful post, this one on Willa Cather
and Saratchandra Chattopadhyay
, and the difficulty of tearing oneself away from imagined worlds and fictional characters, so real to us once we have invested time and imagination on them. Read "Life winding down in Cather and Saratchandra."
Knowledge and the State
The Telegraph writes:
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.
The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
October 2044
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Knowledge has advanced not because of the state but despite its presence. The state has a natural propensity to regulate, to monitor and to control. The pursuit of knowledge strives to free itself from shackles of any kind. These are irreconcilable positions. But in India the belief persists that the state can directly participate in the advancement of knowledge. This participation goes far beyond the funding of educational and research establishments. The attempt to control these institutions is common to all governments in India, irrespective of their ideological orientation.The editorial correctly points out that the new Knowledge Commission set up by Manmohan Singh aims for "not the pursuit of knowledge, but of utility." It correctly concludes: "The state should leave knowledge alone if it wants knowledge to flourish." Read the full piece.
That's when the last daily newspaper will be read, according to Philip Meyer, the author of "The Vanishing Newspaper
". Well, Paul Farhi of the Washington Post objects to that prognosis in an article in the American Journalism Review, in which he makes a convincing case that "newspapers may have the best chance of any of the old media to survive in a new-media world."
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
I agree with him.
(Link via email from Chandrahas.)
Lovers of Cows
The noble Ajay Bhat sends me a link to an outstanding animated film called "The Meatrix", starring Moo-pheus. I recommend you watch it instantly. It's Moo-velous.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Haters of Cows
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]
And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Relying on Reliance
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Vikram Arumilli writes in:
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Amit, I don't understand your love of cows. They cause smog. They step on geese. They fall on farmers. They're running wild in Bhopal. Madness, I say. [Links in original.]And to add to that Roshan Revankar writes in saying: "Cows cause air pollution."
Sigh. Weep. Wail with anguish. What is happening to the blogosphere that such respected bloggers take up such an unworthy cause? Are they in the pay of goats? Do they not know that "cow is their mother"? And, most pertinently, have they never experienced bovine bliss?
But they will be fought, and beaten, and even eaten by cows in snazzy dinner jackets saying to each other, "Hey, this steak is too well done. Must be an Arumilli." Watch this space.
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Wednesday, August 03, 2005
Reliance Energy (RE) is getting a lot of flak for not restoring power to some parts of Mumbai, a soft target for politicians who wish to deflect attention from their own shortcomings. As I'd written in this post on Cloudburst Mumbai, I find Anil Ambani's explanation quite reasonable: in areas that are still flooded, RE is giving precedence to human life over electricity, as indeed it should. Well, Gaurav Sabnis covers all the bases in a lusty defence of Reliance, and points out:
If the floods had happened 5 years back, when BSES was a state-owned company, no politician would have dared talk of arrests. But now that it is a private company, they casually throw around ideas of placing the Reliance Energy [officials] behind bars.Gaurav ends by writing that he would "love to see arrested the politicians of both [the Shiv] Sena and [the] Congress, who did not bother to add a single megawatt of capacity in Maharashtra in over a decade and plunged the state into a sure-fire crisis." Well, leave alone arrest them, I'd just love to see them voted out of power and a new class of politicians emerge. Pipe dreams.
A lot of consumers and politicians have asked why Tata Power did not face any such problems. Firstly, Tata Power mainly supplies energy in South Mumbai, where the rains were 15 times milder. Secondly, Tata Power has always been a private company. They set up their own infrastructure, including transformers and lines. They thus made the infrastructure adhere to their standards, which would obviously be stricter than a government owned company.
However Reliance Energy inherited the infrastructure from BSES. They did not install these transformers in low-lying areas. The infrastructure was of a shoddy public sector level.
Imagine the logo
Adidas buys Reebok.
August company
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Everybody I meet this month.
Musharraf's Pakistan
A place where a victim of rape is detained in a psychiatric hospital so that she can't tell her story to the world and embarrass the country. No, I'm not talking about Mukhtar Mai, but about Dr Shazia Khalid, the courageous lady who gives Pakistan far more reason for pride than Pervez Musharraf, whose rhetoric of a progressive Pakistan is a matter of public relations and not conviction. Read Nicholas Kristof's two excellent articles on Dr Khalid here and here.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.
The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
The DVD revolution
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay Epstein
explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
In the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
In the first of those Kristof quotes Dr Shershah Syed, a Karachi gynecologist, as saying:
When I treat rape victims, I tell the girls not to go to the police. Because if she goes to the police, the police will rape her.The second is the heartrending story of how the authorities in Pakistan tried to shut Dr Khalid up, even threatening to kill her, and how her husband supported her through the torment.
(Link via email from Arun Simha.)
James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker about Hollywood's impending reinvention:
In some ways, that reinvention is already under way. As Edward Jay EpsteinIn the DVD Age, writes Surowiecki, Hollywood will "spend less and make more". Read the full piece, and also read Chris Anderson's outstanding piece in Wired last year that explains the phenomenon that is transforming the entertainment industry: The Long Tail.explains in his new book about the economics of Hollywood, “The Big Picture
,” in 1947 box-office receipts accounted for ninety-five per cent of the studios’ revenue; today, they account for less than a fifth. The key to this transformation is the DVD, one of the most lucrative innovations in Hollywood since the introduction of sound. Unlike videotapes, their predecessors, DVDs have remarkably high profit margins—they’re cheap to make, and people buy them rather than just renting them. The DVD, then, has changed the way the studios make money. But it has only started to change the movies they make.
Hollywood’s basic strategy is a familiar one: invest a huge amount of money in films that have the potential to be blockbusters, target teen-agers as a core audience, and spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to get people to the theatre on the first weekend. This is a high-risk, high-reward strategy, and it can work, but it makes less sense in a world in which DVDs are the main source of revenue.
"Rather"
One of the most charming words in the English language. Rather pleasurable to use, and somewhat under-rated.
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Hmm. "Somewhat" is rather nice as well.
Snakes
The BHEL issue is under consideration, says P Chidambaram, the union finance minister.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
I Love Luchi
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
But the PAO BHAJI issue has been resolved.
Perfect name for a Bengali cookery show.
Cowism
Heh. The Times group has now taken to making online presentations out of junk mail, but when it's about cows, as this one is, I don't mind at all. The particular cow they've featured, though, appears rather anguished. Would it rather be elsewhere?
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The two faces of Sourav Ganguly
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
(Link via email from Ujval Gandhi.)
Previous posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
The totalitarian party
The Indian Express reports:
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
Domain under water
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.
Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The CPI(M) in Kerala has sacked a photographer with its newspaper, Desabhimani, for allegedly making a comment on party General Secretary Prakash Karat. When Padmakumar, staff photographer of Desabhimani for over 15 years, noticed Karat’s face on the new screen-savers installed in the newspaper’s computers, his colleagues say, he quipped that the party could do without such idolising.And Padmakumar was asked to leave.
But word got around and within a week, the CPI(M) state secretariat itself had mulled over this act of "grave indiscipline," formed a committee and conducted an official probe.
Now imagine if this party was actually in power at the center. Actually, don't imagine. Just think back to the communist governments of the 20th century, in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and so on. Why on earth do we still put up with them?
The .in domain went down recently because of the cloudburst in Mumbai. Arzan Sam Wadia, giving us the dope on how flooding damaged the registry's name servers, writes:
The internet is one of the most virtual of concepts. With news like this, one is reminded that however virtual it may be, most things are grounded in reality and physicality.Indeed.
Give a harmonium to a panda...
... and you'll have pandemonium.
Monday, August 01, 2005
No respecter of morals
The Economist says:
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
Xena
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
AIDS is no respecter of morals: it affects babies as they are born, children as they are orphaned, nurses as they are accidentally pricked by a dirty needle, patients of any kind as they receive a transfusion of contaminated blood. Indeed, it affects the entire society in which its victims live and die.Oh yes they do. Millions might already have died because of Pope John Paul II's opposition to the use of condoms, and the catholic church isn't alone in thinking in this manner. Denial of AIDS is widespread in official circles in India because of misguided nationalism, and there's probably a moral angle to it there as well, given the sanctimony that pervades our politics. But the disease inflicts more than just prostitutes and gay people, and it affects all of us. And there could be nothing more immoral than turning a blind eye to it.
It also affects the faithful wife of the unfaithful husband. That is why the ABC slogan so beloved by the Bush administration—Abstinence, Be faithful and Condoms—is, in practice, a slap in the face to many people. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief commits at least a third of its promised $15 billion to “abstinence until marriage” as the main way of stopping the spread of AIDS. It also urges that the use of condoms be confined to people who engage in “risky behaviour”—prostitutes or couples with one member who is HIV-positive. Many groups are reported to be ending or reducing their condom-promotion schemes to qualify for American money.
That might not matter if condoms did not matter, but they do.
2003UB313 has now been confirmed as the tenth planet of our solar system, says the Independent, and has been "tentatively christened Xena".
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Hmm. Does this mean that it'll be a Lawless Planet?
Bulls fight bears in the rains
Sucheta Dalal writes in the Indian Express:
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Gaurav's goat
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]
Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
The benchmark Sensex shimmied up 91 points in the first 30 minutes of trading last Friday when Indian stockmarkets re-opened for trading after the biggest deluge in history crippled India’s commercial capital and its largest listed company suffered extensive damage due to a massive fire at Bombay High.Read the full piece, in which Dalal gives us the inside dope on "a massive bull-bear tussle".
Is this a sign of bullishness, irrational exuberance, or worse, the sign of sinister manipulation of stock prices to ensure that the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) Nifty remains at a high on Friday, which was expiry day for Futures & Options contracts.
The public sector should leave Gaurav Sabnis's goat alone. Gaurav writes:
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
You know what really gets my goat about the public sector entities? Not that they're inefficient. Not that they waste taxpayer's money. Not that they infringe on areas best left for private initiative and free market. All these things get my goat too, but what REALLY gets my goat about the public sector is the sheer hypocrisy. [Emphasis in the original.]Gaurav goes on to illustrate public-sector hypocrisy by using the example of Doordarshan and cricket. It's a good post, read the full thing.
Should we initiate a public interest litigation to stop the public sector from messing with Gaurav's goat? I suspect that to achieve that objective we'd just have to abolish it. There are plenty of good reasons, besides that fine animal, to do so.
Note: I don't write often about goats, but cows are a different matter. Some posts on cows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Bidding for taxis
In a post on Marginal Revolution titled "How to improve taxi markets", Tyler Cowen writes:
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]
Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.
Singapore has solved this problem, with a little assistance from satellite technology. Imagine Walrasian taxi markets. The taxi driver receives a satellite message on his little thingie, specifying where the customer wishes to be picked up and where he wishes to go. The cabbie, if interested, then enters a bid for how much he will charge. The customer is matched with the cabbie who enters the lowest bid. [Link in the original.]Outstanding. Many of you might complain, of course, that people travelling at odd times on strange routes might have trouble getting a cab at an affordable price. But that's a problem that's actually worse now in Indian cities, where rude autorickshaw and taxi drivers simply turn you down if your destination is unacceptable to them. Under the Singapore kind of system, instead of the handful of taxis you can reach by foot declining to take you, you'd have access to every taxi driver in the area, and would get the fairest price possible, instead of no ride at all.
How many decades before we can get cabs like this in Indian cities, I wonder.



