India Uncut
This blog has moved to its own domain. Please visit IndiaUncut.com for the all-new India
Uncut and bookmark it. The new site has much more content and some new sections, and you can read about them here and here. You can subscribe to full RSS feeds of all the sections from here.
This blogspot site will no longer be updated, except in case of emergencies, if the main site suffers a prolonged outage. Thanks - Amit.
Monday, July 11, 2005
The right and the wrong ways to tackle poverty
In an excellent essay in Tech Central Station, Arnold Kling of EconLog points out that contrary to what many of the stars behind Live 8 seem to believe, redistribution is not the solution to poverty, but market institutions are. Kling writes:
(TCS essay link via Cafe Hayek.)
Two years ago, economist Paul Rubin published a paper called Folk Economics (note: payment or subscription required). As this description points out, Rubin suggests that in a hunter-gatherer tribe, goods are exchanged mostly through sharing and reciprocal altruism. There were no visible gains from impersonal trade or economic growth. In this zero-sum environment, people evolved an instinct to resent and punish those who took too much.Kling's essay is superb, and Folk Economics is also worth a read. I followed Kling's link, and was able to download a free pdf. Good stuff.
Rubin's thesis is that the instincts that evolved in prehistoric tribes account for the misguided "folk economics" that many people believe today. Anti-globalization and opposition to free trade reflect the fear of strangers that was inherent in tribal society. Resentment of the rich and a belief in redistribution reflect the hunter-gatherer's zero-sum thinking.
In a well-functioning modern economy, wealth is created rather than stolen. People develop new technologies, new ways of satisfying human wants, and more efficient ways of producing and distributing goods and services. As the quote from Lucas [earlier in the piece] indicates, we owe our well-being to this process of economic growth, not to redistribution. [Links in original.]
(TCS essay link via Cafe Hayek.)